Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 27;13:908011. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.908011

TABLE 1.

Differential gut microbiota between patients with different progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Patients Composition Sex (female/male) Age (years) Sequencing method Phylum Family Genus References
NAFLD vs. healthy controls (HC) 39 participants including 13 NAFLD patients and 26 HC NAFLD: 7/6
HC: 12/14
NAFLD: 13.6 ± 3.0
HC: 13.3 ± 2.7
16S rRNA Epsilonproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria↑ / Prevotella↑ Michail et al., 2015
NAFLD vs. HC 72 participants including 18 NAFLD patients and 54 HC NAFLD: 12/6 HC: 39/15 NAFLD: 54.0 ± 14.9
HC: 45.9 ± 19.9
16S rRNA / Rikenellaceae, Mogibacterium, Peptostreptococcaceae Streptococcus, Bacillus, Lactococcus↑ and Catenibacterium, Pseudomonas Caussy et al., 2019
NAFLD vs. HC 85 participants including 53 NAFLD patients and 32 HC NAFLD: 27/26
HC: 27/5
NAFLD: 48 (22–72)
HC: 41 (26–52)
16S rRNA Lentisphaerae Ruminococcaceae Alternatively, Escherichia, Anaerobacter, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Clostridium XI? and Alistipes, Prevotella, Oscillibacter, Odoribacter, Flavonifractor Jiang et al., 2015
NAFLD vs. HC 60 participants including 30 NAFLD patients and 30 HC NAFLD: 17/13
HC: 17/13
NAFLD: 49 (34–57)
HC: 51 (47–56)
Multitag pyrosequencing Lachnospiraceae↑ and Ruminococcaceae / Lactobacillus, Dorea, Robinsoniella, Roseburia↑ and Oscillibacter Raman et al., 2013
NAFLD vs. HC 126 participants including 43 NAFLD patients and 83 HC NAFLD: 7/36
HC: 13/70
NAFLD: 47 (34.5–61.0)
HC: 40.5 (33.0–52.0)
16S rRNA Bacteroidetes↑ and Firmicutes / Coprococcu, Pseudobutyrivibrio, Moryella, Roseburia, Anaerosporobacter, Anaerotruncus, Ruminococcus, Lactobacillus Wang et al., 2016
NAFLD vs. HC 81 participants including 27 NAFLD patients and 54 HC NAFLD: 6/21
HC: 31/23
NAFLD: 12.04 ± 2.78
HC: 10.24 ± 2.51
16S rRNA Actinobacteria↑ and Bacteroidetes Rikenellaceae Bradyrhizobium, Anaerococcus, Peptoniphilus, Propionibacterium acnes, Dorea, Ruminococcus↑ and Oscillospira Del Chierico et al., 2017
NAFLD vs. HC 47 participants including 25 NAFLD patients and 22 HC NAFLD: 6/19
HC: 5/17
NAFLD: 45.5 ± 10.1
HC: 50.5 ± 9.5
16S rDNA Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria↑ and Bacteroidetes Lachnospiraceae, Enterobacteriaceae, Erysipelotrichaceae, Streptococcaceae↑ and Prevotellaceae, Ruminococcaceae Escherichia Shigella, Lachnospiraceae Incertae Sedis, Blautia↑ and Prevotella Shen et al., 2017
NASH vs. HC 38 participants including 16 NASH patients and 22 HC NASH: 7/9
HC: 13/9
NASH: 51 ± 9
HC: 44 ± 10
16S rRNA / / Parabacteroides, Allisonella↑ and Faecalibacterium, Anaerosporobacter Wong et al., 2013
NASH vs. HC 39 participants including 22 NASH patients and 17 HC NASH: 12/10
HC: 7/10
NASH: 47 (29–68)
HC: 36 (23–58)
qPCR Percentage of Bacteroidetes / / Mouzaki et al., 2013
NASH vs. HC 80 participants including 26 NASH patients and 54 HC NASH: 15/11
HC: 31/23
NASH: 12.27 ± 2.47
HC: 10.24 ± 2.51
16S rRNA / / Dorea, Ruminococcus, Blautia↑ and Oscillospira Del Chierico et al., 2017
NASH vs. HC 28 participants including 6 NASH patients and 22 HC NASH: not listed
HC: 5/17
NASH: not listed
HC: 50.5 ± 9.5
16S rDNA / Lachnospiraceae↑ Blautia↑ Shen et al., 2017
NASH vs. HC 38 participants including 22 NASH patients and 16 HC NASH: 10/13
HC: 6/10
NASH: 13.6 ± 3.5
HC: 14.4 ± 1.8
16S rRNA Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria↑ and Firmicutes Prevotellaceae, Alcaligenaceae, Enterobacteriaceae↑ and Bifidobacteriaceae, Rikenellaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae Prevotella, Peptoniphilus↑ and Bifidobacterium, Oscillospira, Roseburia, Alistipes, Blautia, Coprococcus, Ruminococcus Zhu et al., 2013
NASH vs. HC 30 participants including 10 NASH and 20 HC NASH: 4/6
HC: 7/13
NASH: 61 (52–70)
HC: 55 (47–64)
16S rRNA / / Bacteroides↑ and
Prevotella
Boursier et al., 2016
Fibrosis vs. HC 47 participants including 27 fibrosis patients and 20 HC Fibrosis: 12/15
HC: 7/13
Fibrosis: 62 (56–67)
HC: 55 (47–64)
16S rRNA / / Ruminococcus, Bacteroides↑ and Prevotella Boursier et al., 2016
Fibrosis vs. NAFLD 86 participants including 14 fibrosis patients and 72 NAFLD patients Fibrosis: 12/2
NAFLD: 36/36
Fibrosis: 63.4 ± 3
NAFLD: 49.3 ± 12.6
Whole-genome shotgun sequencing Proteobacteria↑
and Firmicutes
/ / Loomba et al., 2017
Cirrhosis vs. HC 80 participants including 26 cirrhotic patients and 54 HC Cirrhosis: 20/6
HC: 39/15
Cirrhosis: 65.1 ± 9.8
HC: 45.9 ± 19.9
16S rRNA / Enterobacteriaceae↑ and Rikenellaceae, Mogibacterium, Peptostreptococcaceae Streptococcus, Megasphaera, Gallibacterium↑ and Catenibacterium, Pseudomonas Caussy et al., 2019
Cirrhosis vs. HC 181 participants including 98 cirrhotic patients and 83 HC Cirrhosis: 33/65
HC: 35/48
Cirrhosis: 50 ± 11
HC: 42 ± 9
/ Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria↑ and Bacteroidetes
/ Veillonella, Streptococcus, Clostridium, Prevotella↑ and Bacteroides, Eubacterium, Alistipes Qin et al., 2014
Cirrhosis vs. HC 61 participants including 47 cirrhotic patients and 14 HC Early cirrhosis: 6/17
Advanced cirrhosis: 4/20
HC: 4/10
Early cirrhosis: 55 ± 2
Advanced cirrhosis: 54 ± 5
HC: 52 ± 5
Multi-tagged pyrosequencing / Enterobacteriaceae, Veillonellaceae↑ and Lachonospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae Blautia Kakiyama et al., 2013
Cirrhosis vs. HC 60 participants including 36 cirrhotic patients and 24 HC Cirrhosis: 11/25
HC: 10/14
Cirrhosis: 49 ± 11
HC: 46 ± 8
16S rRNA Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria↑ and Bacteroidetes Enterobacteriaceae, Veillonellaceae, Streptococcaceae↑ and Lachnospiraceae / Chen et al., 2011
Cirrhosis vs. HC 244 participants including 219 cirrhotic patients and 25 HC Compensated Outpatients: 92/29
Decompensated Outpatients: 40/14
Inpatients: 31/13
HC: 17/8
Compensated Outpatients: 57.5 ± 6.1
Decompensated Outpatients: 56.8 ± 6.8
Inpatients: 55.9 ± 6.7
HC: 55.7 ± 8.5
Multi-tagged pyrosequencing / Staphylococcae, Enterococceae, Enterobacteriaceae↑ and Clostridiales XIV, Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, Rikenellaceae / Bajaj et al., 2014
Cirrhosis vs. HC 58 participants including 30 cirrhotic patients and 28 HC Cirrhosis: 7/23
HC: 6/22
Cirrhosis: 49 ± 8
HC: 52 ± 9
16S rRNA / / Veillonella, Megasphaera, Dialister, Atopobium, Prevotella↑ and Neisseria, Haemophilus, SR1 genera incertae sedis Chen et al., 2016
Cirrhosis vs. HC 40 participants including 20 cirrhotic patients and 20 HC Cirrhosis: 8/12
HC: 11/9
Cirrhosis: 60.62 ± 10.46
HC: 60 ± 14
16S rRNA Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria↑ and Verrucomicrobia, Tenericutes, Euryarchaeota
Enterobacteriaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Pasteurellaceae, Rikenellaceae, Prevotellaceae, Bacteroidaceae, Porphyromonadaceae, Barnesillaceae, Streptococcaceae, Enterococcaceae, Veillonellaceae↑ and Verrucomicrobiaceae, Methanobacteriaceae Lactobacillus, Haemophilus, Klebsiella, Prevotella, Parabacteroides, Phascolarctobacterium, Veillonella, Enterococcus, Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Bacteroides, Atopobium, Dialister, Ruminococcus, Christensenella↑ and Akkermansia, Methanobrevibacter Ponziani et al., 2019
HCC vs. Cirrhosis 41 participants including 21 HCC patients and 20 cirrhotic patients HCC: 3/18
Cirrhosis: 8/12
HCC: 66.38 ± 6.67
Cirrhosis: 60.62 ± 10.46
16S rRNA Bacteroidetes↑ Bacteroidaceae, Streptococcaceae, Enterococcaceae, Gemellaceae↑ and Verrucomicrobiaceae, Bifidobacteriaceae Phascolarctobcterium, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Gemella, Bilophila↑ and Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, Dialister, Collinsella, Adlercreutzia Ponziani et al., 2019