Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 11;151:269–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.002

Table 7.

Statistical support for the hypotheses.

Hypothesis Description Result
H1 Increased use of technology during enforced work from home positively affects work technology platform stress (WTPS). Supported
H2 Increased use of technology for personal use during enforced work from home positively affects personal technology platform stress (PTPS). Supported
H3 Work technology platform stress (WTPS) during enforced work from home positively affects techno-exhaustion. Supported
H4 Personal technology platform technostress (PTPS) during enforced work from home positively affects techno-exhaustion. Supported
H5 Techno-exhaustion during enforced work from home period negatively affects individual’s subjective wellbeing. Supported
H6 The effect of increasing work-related technology use on work technology platform stress is moderated by the intensity of remote working during enforced work-from-home, such that the effect is stronger for individuals who have limited remote working opportunities. Supported
H7 The effect of increasing personal technology platform use during the enforced work-from-home on personal technology platform stress (PTPS) is moderated by remote working intensity before the enforced work-from-home period, such that the effect is stronger for individuals engaged in limited remote work. Supported
H8 Resilience moderates the effect of techno-exhaustion on subjective wellbeing such that techno-exhaustion has a stronger negative effect for individuals with high resilience. Supported
H9 Resilience moderates the effect of remote work intensity on subjective wellbeing before the enforced work-from-home period, where individuals’ resilience with low or no previous remote working experience positively affects subjective wellbeing. Supported