Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 2;18:e00257. doi: 10.1016/j.parepi.2022.e00257

Table 2.

Prevalence of Urogenital schistosomiasis by filtration and indirect diagnostic methods.

Variable Category Macrohematuria
Microhematuria
Filtration
Positive (%) p-value Positive (%) p-value Positive (%) P-value
Overall (n = 389) 5(1.3) 37 (9.5) 27 (6.9)
Sex Male 2 (1.1) 1.000* 20 (11.2) 0.302 16 (8.9) 0.166
Female 3 (1.4) 17 (8.1) 11 (5.2)
Age group (years) 6–9 2 (1.2) 1.000* 10 (6.1) 0.130 11 (6.7) 0.794
10–12 3 (1.8) 21 (12.4) 11 (6.5)
13–15 0 (0.0) 6 (10.9) 5 (9.1)
School class Mbaju 0 (0.0) 0.207* 9 (11.5) 0.000 4 (5.1) 0.001
Chigugu 1 (1.3) 18 (23.1) 14 (17.9)
Mbemba 1 (1.3) 4 (5.2) 2 (2.6)
Lukuledi 0 (0.0) 2 (2.6) 4 (5.1)
Mkululu 3 (3.8) 4 (5.1) 3 (3.8)
I 1 (1.5) 0.905* 4 (6.2) 0.064 5 (7.7) 0.862*
II 0 (0.0) 3 (4.7) 4 (6.2)
III 1 (1.5) 4 (6.2) 3 (4.6)
IV 2 (3.1) 10 (15.4) 4 (6.2)
V 0(0.0) 11 (16.9) 7 (10.8)
VI 1 (1.5) 5 (7.7) 4 (6.2)