Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 8;12(7):e053152. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053152

Table 3.

Adjusted ORs from logistic regression models predicting self-reported IFA use at midline as a function of treatment assignment, exposure to three intervention components, and control variables

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
RANI intervention overall 16.94*** 5.24*** 3.62*** 5.16*** 2.25*
Group education sessions
1 (vs 0) 1.50 1.17
2 (vs 0) 2.89*** 1.71*
3 (vs 0) 2.94*** 1.37
4 (vs 0) 3.05*** 1.30
5 (vs 0) 3.80*** 1.43
6 (vs 0) 5.37*** 1.76*
7 (vs 0) 5.39*** 1.39
8 (vs 0) 8.53*** 2.41*
9 (vs 0) 8.16*** 2.30**
10 (vs 0) 9.23*** 2.23*
11 (vs 0) 11.97*** 2.81**
Anaemia testing
1 (vs 0) 4.91*** 3.07***
2 (vs 0) 6.93*** 3.72***
3 (vs 0) 11.94*** 5.65***
4 (vs 0) 12.91*** 4.90***
RANI Comm videos
1 (vs 0) 2.30*** 1.44
2 (vs 0) 2.85*** 1.59
3 (vs 0) 3.57*** 1.72*
4 (vs 0) 5.66*** 2.39***
Control variables
Age 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.99
Education 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.98 0.97
Breast feeding 1.35* 1.37* 1.41* 1.41** 1.43**
No of children 0.99 0.96 0.96 0.97 0.95
Caste/tribe 1.31* 1.26 1.31* 1.28 1.26
Knows anaemia status at baseline 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Baseline IFA use 2.59*** 2.94*** 3.30*** 2.87*** 3.36***
Non-RANI intervention exposure 1.85 1.28 1.57 1.59 1.36
Pseudo R2 0.20 0.24 0.24 0.23 0.26

*P<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

IFA, iron folic acid; RANI, Reduction in Anaemia through Normative Innovations.