Table 2.
Quality assessment for non-randomized trials.
Quality assessment for non-randomized trials | Hu HJ | Tang YF | Vazquez O | Yan CP | Yang JZ | Yang YJ | Zhou XQ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A clearly stated aim | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Inclusion of consecutive patients | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Prospective data collection | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
A follow-up period appropriate to the aims of study | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Less than 5% loss to follow-up | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Prospective calculation of the sample size | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
An adequate control group | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Contemporary groups | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Baseline equivalence of groups | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Adequate statistical analyses | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Total score | 20 | 20 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 20 |