Abstract
We genetically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae to express ferritin, a ubiquitous iron storage protein, with the major heavy-chain subunit of tadpole ferritin. A 450-kDa ferritin complex can store up to 4,500 iron atoms in its central cavity. We cloned the tadpole ferritin heavy-chain gene (TFH) into the yeast shuttle vector YEp352 under the control of a hybrid alcohol dehydrogenase II and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase promoter. We confirmed transformation and expression by Northern blot analysis of the recombinant yeast, by Western blot analysis using an antibody against Escherichia coli-expressed TFH, and with Prussian blue staining that indicated that the yeast-expressed tadpole ferritin was assembled into a complex that could bind iron. The recombinant yeast was more iron tolerant in that 95% of transformed cells, but none of the recipient strain cells, could form colonies on plates containing 30 mM ferric citrate. The cell-associated concentration of iron was 500 μg per gram (dry cell weight) of the recombinant yeast but was 210 μg per gram (dry cell weight) in the wild type. These findings indicate that the iron-carrying capacity of yeast is improved by heterologous expression of tadpole ferritin and suggests that this approach may help relieve dietary iron deficiencies in domesticated animals by the use of the engineered yeast as a feed and food supplement.
Iron is an essential trace element for most living organisms. However, its availability is limited by the low solubility of Fe(III) and the ability of intracellular free iron to cause the production of toxic radicals. Iron deficiency is a common and serious nutritional problem that afflicts an estimated 30% of the world's population (32), especially when vegetable-based diets are the primary food source (6, 8). Animal feeds based primarily on cereals often lack iron. Once iron is introduced into a cell, an intracellular storage form of iron is required that is soluble, nontoxic, and bioavailable (11, 28).
Ferritin (apoferritin-Fe complex) is an iron storage protein found in most living organisms (27). Genes encoding this protein have been isolated from various sources including humans, animals, amphibia, plants, fungi, and bacteria (28). Ferritin is a spherical macromolecule with a protein coat of 24 structurally equivalent subunits that can contain up to 4,500 iron atoms as a ferric oxyhydroxide polymer in its central core (29). The major role of ferritin is to provide iron for the synthesis of iron-containing proteins and to prevent damage from free radicals produced by iron-dioxygen interactions (29, 30). In ferritin, there are two main subunits, heavy (also known as heart, or H) and light (as known as liver, or L). Tissue isoferritins have functional differences that may be related to the structural properties of the subunits (1, 26). The H-rich ferritins associate at a lower isoelectric point and lower iron content and accumulate and release iron relatively rapidly (1, 3). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that the Escherichia coli-expressed H subunit of tadpole ferritin assembles into a large homopolymeric ferritin complex that can bind iron (13). There are two forms of iron storage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the first is a cytosolic ferritin-like molecule, and the second implies localization of iron to vacuoles where the iron is bound to polyphosphate instead of ferritin (20). The molecular mass of yeast ferritin is estimated to be 274 kDa, with subunits of approximately 11 kDa. Yeast ferritin's iron content is low; i.e., it binds 50 to 100 iron atoms per molecule in a manner essentially independent of intracellular iron concentration, while the concentration of vacuolar iron in yeast is responsive to the cellular environment (20). The simple addition of iron salts as a feed supplement to the diet of domesticated animals results in the production of hexaferric phytate, a relatively unavailable nutritional source of iron (21). However, when ferritin is administered orally to animals, it can prevent iron binding by phytic acid and provide a source of iron for the treatment of anemia (2).
A commercial process for the production of an iron-fortified food additive requires a nonpathogenic organism amenable to large-scale, high-cell-density fermentation, e.g., S. cerevisiae. The food yeast S. cerevisae is a GRAS (generally recognized as safe) organism and can be grown for the production of biomass rich in high-quality proteins and vitamins. As a consequence, it has been used in livestock feeds for fish (salmonids), poultry, and fur-bearing animals and a food supplement for humans (5).
Our objective in this study was to enhance the bioavailable iron-carrying capacity of a currently used feed additive through the heterologous expression of the tadpole ferritin heavy chain in yeast. We tested whether the homopolymeric ferritin could bind iron in yeast and whether the iron content of the recombinant yeast could be further increased in iron-rich media.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and culture conditions.
Plasmids were maintained and propagated in E. coli HB101 or DH5α according to Sambrook et al. (24). S. cerevisiae 2805 (MATα pep4::HIS3 prb1 Δcan1 GAL2 his3 ura3-52) was used as a recipient cell for ferritin expression (18).
S. cerevisiae was maintained in YEPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% dextrose) medium and uracil-deficient (ura−) selective medium (0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids [Sigma Co., St. Louis, Mo.], 30 mg [each] of adenine and tryptophan per liter, 0.5% Casamino Acid, 2% dextrose, and 2% agar) was used to screen transformants at 30°C. Primary inoculum was prepared from 5 ml of the ura− selective medium cultured for 24 h, and 107 cells were inoculated into a 300-ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 40 ml of YEPD medium. Expression cultures were grown at 30°C with continuous agitation (200 rpm), after which cells were harvested and examined for the expression of ferritin.
To verify iron tolerance, transformants were grown and the number of CFU on ura− selective plates supplemented with ferric citrate was counted.
The stability of the plasmids introduced into yeast was measured as follows: samples grown in nonselective YEPD medium were serially diluted with sterile H2O to an expected 50 CFU per plate and plated on a ura− selective plate and a nonselective plate, and the relative number of CFU was determined.
Vector construction.
We cloned the tadpole ferritin heavy-chain gene (TFH) (GenBank accession no. M15655), located 9 bp upstream from the translational start codon to 24 bp downstream of the translational stop codon, between the ADH2-GPD hybrid promoter and the galactose-1-P uridyl transferase (GAL7) terminator (13, 18) of the episomal shuttle vector YEp352 (18). Briefly, a yeast shuttle vector harboring TFH (pYETFAG-1) was constructed as follows: the 564-bp DNA fragment encoding the tadpole ferritin heavy chain was obtained from an HindIII-SmaI double digest of pMYI15, blunt ended, and then ligated into the blunt-ended BamHI site of the pYEAG-TER vector. The yeast hybrid promoter consisted of the upstream activating sequence of the ADH2 (alcohol dehydrogenase II) gene and the GPD (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) TATA element (18). The GAL7 terminator was provided by S. K. Rhee, Korea Research Institute of Biotechnology and Biochemistry.
S. cerevisiae strain 2805 was transformed by a lithium acetate procedure (12). The transformed cells were selected on ura− selective medium, and the presence of the transforming plasmid was confirmed by back transformation of E. coli with DNA prepared from those putative transformants.
Northern blot analysis.
Transformants were grown in YEPD medium, and total RNA was prepared (17). Following electrophoresis with a 1.2% agarose gel in the presence of formaldehyde and transfer to a nylon membrane, Northern blots were probed with 32P-labeled TFH (24).
Preparation of cell crude extract of yeast.
Cells were grown for 3 days, harvested, washed twice with extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 2 mM EDTA), and ground three times in a bead beater (Biospec Products, Inc., Bartlesville, Okla.) for 1 min. The lysate was centrifuged (10 min at 10,000 × g), and the supernatant was resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (see below). As ferritin is thermostable (13) and as the host strain is protease deficient, all preparation steps were performed at room temperature (∼25°C).
PAGE.
SDS-PAGE was conducted according to the method of Laemmli (15) with a 12% acrylamide separating gel and 5% acrylamide stacking gel, each containing 1% SDS. Samples were heated at 100°C for 10 min in 125 mM Tris-glycine buffer, pH 6.8, containing 1% SDS and 1% β-mercaptoethanol (10). Electrophoresis was carried out at a constant current of 10 mA for 3 h with a running buffer of 25 mM Tris-glycine, pH 8.8, containing 0.1% SDS. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with 0.025% Coomassie brilliant blue R-250.
We used staining with Prussian blue (13) to determine whether the expressed ferritin heavy-chain subunits assemble into a large complex that can store iron. The cell extracts were heated at 75°C for 15 min, resolved by 7.5% PAGE under nondenaturing conditions (10), and then stained with a mixture (1:1, vol/vol) of 2% K4Fe(CN)6 and 2% 11.6 M HCl prepared immediately before use (13). Horse spleen ferritin purchased from Sigma and E. coli-derived TFH obtained from a previous study (13) were included as controls.
Western blot analysis.
The cell extract resolved by SDS-PAGE was blotted onto a nitrocellulose filter. After being blocked, the filter was incubated with an anti-E. coli expressed TFH antiserum (13), followed by anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conjugated to horseradish peroxidase as a secondary antibody. 4-Chloro-1-naphthol was used as a substrate for colorimetric detection with horseradish peroxidase (24).
Atomic absorption spectrometry.
We conducted an iron uptake assay with samples grown in ura− selective medium supplemented with ferric citrate. Cells were grown in YEPD medium supplemented with ferric citrate at 30°C for 4 days, harvested by centrifugation (10 min; 3,500 × g), washed three times with H2O, and then dried at 50°C for 48 h. The dried cells were digested with 6 ml of 14 M nitric and 10 M perchloric acids (2:1, vol/vol) in a glass tube at 250°C for 8 h. The concentration of iron was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS 208; Hitachi, Inc., Ibaraki, Japan) (16).
Statistical analyses were made by the t test procedure from the Statistical Analysis System (version 6.0 for PC; SAS/STAT Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C.) (25).
RESULTS
Expression of TFH gene in recombinant yeast.
From Northern blot analysis of transformants, we found that the introduced TFH gene was expressed under the control of the hybrid promoter. Transformant TYETFAG-1 was arbitrarily selected for further experiments from 10 candidates which showed a similar level of expression (Fig. 1). Plasmid stability was good, and more than 80% of plated cells appeared to carry the plasmid 72 h after liquid cultivation, while no loss of plasmid was observed under selective conditions (data not shown).
FIG. 1.
Northern blot analysis of TFH. (A) Lane 1 contains the 0.56-kb cDNA fragment of TFH as a positive control. Lanes 2 to 4 contain total RNA from the recipient strain, the transformant without ethanol induction, and the transformant with ethanol induction, respectively. Panels B and C show the gel stained with ethidium bromide and Northern blot analysis of GPD, respectively, indicating that an equal amount of RNA has been loaded for each sample.
Western blot analysis of recombinant TFH.
Different banding patterns were observed from preparations obtained from horse spleen ferritin, E. coli-derived TFH, and TYETFAG-1, but not from the recipient cell (Fig. 2). Although the antibody obtained from the previous study is polyclonal and the specificity is not high enough to show a single band, the distinctive band obtained with an antibody against the E. coli-derived TFH appears to be specific to TFH because the molecular mass of the yeast ferritin-like subunit is smaller, 11 kDa, than that of native TFH, 20.5 kDa. The molecular mass of yeast-derived TFH was estimated to be 24 kDa.
FIG. 2.
Western blot analysis of recombinant TFH. (A) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE of the yeast cell extract. (B) Antigen-antibody reaction of the corresponding twin gel of yeast cell extract. Lanes 1, size marker; lanes 2, 2 μg of horse spleen ferritin; lanes 3, 10 μl (1.0 μg μl−1) of E. coli-derived TFH; lanes 4, 15 μ1 (1.0 μg μl−1) of concentrated cell extract of the host cell; lanes 5, 15 μl (1.0 μg μl−1) of concentrated cell extract of the transformant; lanes 6, 30 μl (1.0 μg μl−1) of concentrated cell extract of the transformant. The numbers on the left refer to estimated sizes in kilodaltons.
Iron tolerance of recombinant yeast.
After 48 h of incubation on ura− selective media, transformants could grow on a medium containing 20 mM ferric citrate, but the untransformed host could grow only on a medium containing 10 mM ferric citrate. Small colonies of transformants and host cells appeared on plates containing 30 and 20 mM ferric citrate, respectively, after prolonged incubation (>72 h). However, no growth of the recipient cells was ever detected on plates with 30 mM ferric citrate.
Iron-binding capability of recombinant TFH.
The iron-binding capability of the expressed TFH was analyzed with Prussian blue staining (Fig. 3). After being stained with ferrocyanide, a characteristic blue band was observed in cell extracts from transformants, indicating that the TFH subunits had assembled into a functional protein that could bind irons. No staining was observed in the recipient cell (Fig. 3).
FIG. 3.
Prussian blue staining of TFH. (A) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE of the yeast cell extract. (B) Prussian blue-stained PAGE after preincubation of the yeast cell extract with 1 mM ferrous ammonium sulfate. Lanes: 1, horse spleen ferritin; 2, E. coli-derived TFH; 3, concentrated cell extract of the host cell; 4, concentrated cell extract of the transformant.
Atomic absorption spectrometry.
Iron uptake and cell growth were measured for the recipient strain and the transformant grown at various concentrations of ferric citrate (Table 1). Cells grown in a high-iron-content environment took up significantly more iron. Iron content of the recipient strain increased up to 33-fold in iron-loaded cells. Relative to the untransformed strain, the transformed strain had 160 and 140% increase in iron per gram (dry cell weight) at 10 and 20 mM ferric citrate in culture medium, respectively. Growth of both strains was restricted as the concentration of ferric citrate increased, and the difference between the recipient strain and transformant was statistically significant (P < 0.05) at 20 mM ferric citrate.
TABLE 1.
Atomic absorption spectrometry of intracellular iron content
| Cell type and origin | Fe citrate concn (mM) | No. of cells/mlab | Iron content (ppm)bc |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recipient strain (2805) | 0 | 3.0 × 108 ± 0.8 × 107 | 6.3 ± 1.2 |
| 10 | 2.6 × 108 ± 1.5 × 107 | 120 ± 9.2 | |
| 20 | 1.1 × 108 ± 1.3 × 107 | 210 ± 12 | |
| Transformant (TYETFAG-1) | 0 | 3.2 × 108 ± 1.1 × 107 | 5.3 ± 0.9 |
| 10 | 2.7 × 108 ± 1.6 × 107 | 310 ± 22∗ | |
| 20 | 1.5 × 108 ± 2.1 × 107∗ | 500 ± 41∗ |
Values were obtained from three replicates of each experiment repeated twice.
∗, Values are significantly different from those of the recipient strain (P = 0.05).
Values are means ± standard deviation. ppm, parts per million of cell mass.
DISCUSSION
S. cerevisiae is a well-established host for the production of heterologous proteins (4, 23). Iron has two functions, one as an essential element and the other as a potential toxic radical. Although the effect of Fe radicals on cell damage is widely accepted (22), more than 90% of cases of anemia are caused by iron deficiency (32). Ferritin is an efficient way of storing iron as well as increasing its bioavailability (9).
Eukaryotic ferritin subunits are processed to mature proteins by posttranslational modification (19), but prokaryotic and in vitro translation systems do not process these subunits properly (13, 14, 31). The yeast-derived TFH (24 kDa) in this study was larger than either the native TFH protein (20.5 kDa) (7) or the E. coli-derived TFH (22 kDa). These results suggested that the yeast-derived TFH subunits were not processed correctly. As there is no canonical glycosylation site (Asn-X-Ser/Thr) in TFH (23), this result suggests that a posttranslational modification, other than glycosylation, may occur in yeast. However, Prussian blue staining indicated that the yeast-derived TFH appeared to assemble into a large holoprotein and could store iron. The yeast-derived ferritin also migrates somewhat more slowly on a nondenaturing gel than does the E. coli-derived ferritin (Fig. 3), which is known to be a larger holoprotein than the native tadpole ferritin (13).
Previous studies have shown that vacuolar iron content increases when yeast is subjected to a high concentration of iron, although the cytosolic iron concentration of yeast contributed by a ferritin-like molecule is independent of its environment (20). In our study, the efficacy of iron uptake was significantly increased due to the heterologous expression of TFH and reached two and a half times that of the host strain grown under the same conditions. Although the increase in the total iron concentration in the transformant was relatively modest, growth of the transfomant was robust, suggesting that the difference in iron concentration is due mainly to the presence of TFH, which maintains iron in a nontoxic state. Thus, the bioavailability of iron should be dramatically increased in food and feed supplement with these engineered yeasts.
If ferritin is administered orally to animals, it can provide a source of iron for the treatment of anemia (2). This finding suggests that increasing the amount of iron-containing ferritin in animal feeds might reduce dietary iron deficiency and, perhaps, improve the dietary quality of livestock as an iron-fortified food for human consumption (9). Since S. cerevisiae, as a GRAS organism, has been used for many years as a feed additive and as a food supplement, we expect that yeast iron-fortified food produced by strains such as this could alleviate some problems due to iron deficiency in both humans and animals.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by a grant from the National R&D Program of the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology. We thank the Institute for Molecular Biology and Genetics and the Center for University-Wide Research Facility at Chonbuk National University for providing facilities for this research.
REFERENCES
- 1.Arosio P, Adelman T G, Drysdale J W. On ferritin heterogenity. Further evidence for heteropolymers. J Biol Chem. 1978;253:4451–4458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Beard J L, Burton J W, Theil E C. Purified ferritin and soybean meal can be source of iron for treating iron deficiency in rats. J Nutr. 1996;126:154–160. doi: 10.1093/jn/126.1.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boyd D, Vecoli C, Belcher D M, Jain S K, Drysdale J W. Structural and functional relationships of human ferritin H and L chains deduced from cDNA clones. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:11755–11761. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Buckholz R G, Gleeson M A. Yeast systems for the commercial production of heterologous proteins. Biotechnology. 1991;11:1067–1072. doi: 10.1038/nbt1191-1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bui K, Galzy P. Food yeast. In: Spencer J F T, Spencer D M, editors. Yeast technology. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1990. pp. 241–265. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Craig W J. Iron status of vegetarians. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59(Suppl.):1233S–1237S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/59.5.1233S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dickey L F, Sreedharan S, Theil E C, Didsbury J R, Wang Y H, Kaufman R E. Differences in the regulation of messenger RNA for housekeeping and specialized-cell ferritin. A comparison of three distinct ferritin complementary DNAs, the corresponding subunits, and identification of the first processed in amphibia. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:7901–7907. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gillooly M, Bothwell T H, Torrance J D, Macphail A P, Mayet F. The effect of organic acids, phytates and polyphenols on the absorption of iron from vegetables. Br J Nutr. 1983;49:331–342. doi: 10.1079/bjn19830042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goto F, Yoshihara T, Shigemoto N, Toki S, Takaiwa F. Iron fortification of rice seed by the soybean ferritin gene. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:282–286. doi: 10.1038/7029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hames B D. An introduction to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In: Hames B D, Rickwood D, editors. Gel electrophoresis of proteins, a practical approach. Oxford, England: IRL Press; 1981. pp. 26–42. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Harrison P M, Lilley T H. Ferritin. In: Loehr T M, editor. Iron carriers and iron proteins. New York, N.Y: VCH; 1989. pp. 123–138. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ito H, Fukuda Y, Murata K, Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983;153:163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim Y T, Kim K S. Synthesis of active tadpole H-chain ferritin in Escherichia coli. Mol Cells. 1994;4:125–129. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kimata Y, Theil E C. Posttranscriptional regulation of ferritin during nodule development in soybean. Plant Physiol. 1994;104:263–270. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.1.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Laemmli U K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mateos F, Gonzalez C, Dominguez C, Losa J E, Jimemez A, Perez-Arellano J L. Elevated non-transferrin bound iron in the lungs of patients with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. J Infect. 1999;38:18–21. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(99)90022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mitchell D A, Farh L, Marshall T K, Deschenes R J. A polybasic domain allows nonprenylated Ras proteins to function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:21540–21546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Park E H, Shin Y M, Lim Y Y, Kwon T H, Kim D H, Yang M S. Expression of glucose oxidase by using recombinant yeast. J Biotechnol. 2000;81:35–44. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1656(00)00266-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ragland M, Briat J F, Gagnon J, Laulhere J P, Massenet O, Theil E C. Evidence for a conservation of ferritin sequences among plants and animals and for a transit peptide in soybean. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:18339–18344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Raguzzi F, Lesuisse E, Crichton R. Iron storage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1988;231:253–258. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80742-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Randhawa R R, Kawatra B L. Biological evaluation of iron availability from pre-adolescent diets by using anaemic rats. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1994;45:315–320. doi: 10.1007/BF01088080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Raymond K N, Bryan B L. The coordination chemistry of iron in biological transport and storage; iron removal in vivo. In: Kessissoglou D P, editor. Bioinorganic chemistry: an inorganic perspective of life. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995. pp. 13–24. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Romanos M A, Scorer C A, Clare J J. Foreign gene expression in yeast: a review. Yeast. 1992;8:423–488. doi: 10.1002/yea.320080602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sambrook J, Fritsch E F, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 25.SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT: language guide for personal computers. Version 6 ed. Cary, N.C: SAS Institute, Inc.; 1985. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stefanini S, Chiancone E, Arosio P, Finazzi-Agro A, Antonini E. Structural heterogeneity and subunit composition of horse ferritins. Biochemistry. 1982;21:2293–2299. doi: 10.1021/bi00539a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Theil E C. Ferritin: structure, gene regulation, and cellular function in animals, plants and microorganisms. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987;56:289–315. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.001445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Theil E C. Regulation of ferritin and transferrin receptor mRNAs. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:4771–4774. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Theil E C. The ferritin family of iron storage proteins. Adv Enzymol. 1990;63:421–449. doi: 10.1002/9780470123096.ch7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Theil E C, Burton J W, Beard J L. A sustainable solution for dietary iron deficiency through plant biotechnology and breeding to increase seed ferritin control. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997;51(Suppl. 4):S28–S31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Van Wuytswinkel O, Savino G, Briat J F. Purification and characterization of recombinant pea-seed ferritins expressed in Escherichia coli: influence of N-terminus deletions on protein solubility and core formation in vitro. Biochem J. 1995;305:253–261. doi: 10.1042/bj3050253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.World Health Organization. Natural strategies for overcoming micronutrient malnutrition. Document A45/3. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1992. [Google Scholar]



