Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb;23(2):641–650. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.2.641

Table 3.

EBV Typing in Breast Cancer Patients and Controls

EBV types Number (%) P- value OR (95%CI)
Control group
(n=38)
BC patints
(n=54)
A/B genotypes
Successful typing 36 (94.7) 52 (96.3)
A-genotype 33 (91.7) 47 (90.4) Reference
B-genotype 3 (8.3) 5 (9.6) 0.837 1.102 (0.43-2.78)
C/D subtypes
Successful typing 34 (89.5) 45 (83.3)
C-subtype 12 (35.3) 2 (4.4) Reference
D-subtype 22 (64.7) 43 (95.6) 0.002 11.7 (2.4-57.1)
F/f variants -
Successful typing 36 (94.7) 48 (88.9)
F-variant 36 (100) 48 (100)
f-prototype 0 0
Combined types of EBV
Successful typinga 32 (84.2) 39 (72.2)
ACF 9 (28.1) 1 (2.6) Reference
ADF 20 (62.5) 33 (84.6) 0.005 4.92 (1.61-14.99)
BDF 2 (6.2) 4 (10.3) 0.024 5.54 (1.25-24.41)
BCF 1 (3.1) 1 (2.6) 0.217 3.62 (0.47-27.55)

EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; VCA, Viral capsid antigen; EBNA, Epstein Barr virus nuclear antigen; NA, not amplified gene; BC, breast cancer; a, Combined types of EBV were calculated among 39 cases and 32 controls who were successfully typed for all 3 investigated regions