Skip to main content
. 2022 May 19;70(4):537–545. doi: 10.1007/s12026-022-09287-8

Table 1.

Comparison between the different studied groups according to serum vitamin D concentration

Vitamin D (ng/ml) Negative control UVB exposed Vitamin D supplemented P
Week 0 13.48 ± 1.01 29.69 ± 0.99 12.78 ± 0.92  < 0.001*
p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.262, p3 < 0.001*
Week 1 15.72 ± 0.79 35.11 ± 1.9 15.12 ± 0.85  < 0.001*
p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.555, p3 < 0.001*
Week 2 15.64 ± 1.37 29.64 ± 2.18 17.29 ± 0.73  < 0.001*
p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.06, p3 < 0.001*
Week 3 17.51 ± 0.64 29.25 ± 1.83 18.34 ± 0.65  < 0.001*
p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.278, p3 < 0.001*
Week 4 18.5 ± 0.67 25.08 ± 1.26 19.14 ± 0.79  < 0.001*
p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.298, p3 < 0.001*
Week 5 18.28 ± 0.56 28.42 ± 1.15 20.1 ± 1.07  < 0.001*
p1 < 0.001*, p2 < 0.001*, p3 < 0.001*
Week 6 21.07 ± 1.11 33.72 ± 1.98 21.75 ± 1.75  < 0.001*
p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.634, p3 < 0.001*
Week 7 20.7 ± 0.79 32.97 ± 1.61 19.91 ± 0.84  < 0.001*
p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.287, p3 < 0.001*
p0  < 0.001*  < 0.001*  < 0.001*

p: p value for comparing between the different studied groups

p0: p value for comparing between different weeks in each group

p1: p value for comparing between Negative cont. and UV exposed

p2: p value for comparing between Negative cont. and vitamin D-supplemented group

p3: p value for comparing between UV exposed and vitamin D-supplemented group

*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05