Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun;11(6):1697–1704. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-1194

Table 3. Radiographic and pathological assessment.

Case SLD change from baseline, % SUVmax change from baseline, % y-stage Therapeutic effecta Histologyb P-stage Pathological response
1 –68.0 NA T1cN2M0, IIIa PR SCC T2bN0M0, IIA 15–20% tumor residue
2 –36.6 –41.4 T4N2M0, IIIb PR SCC T2N2M0, IIIB MPR (5% tumor residue)
3 –37.5 –37.2 T3N2M0, IIIb PR SCC T2aN2M0, IIIA 15–20% tumor residue
4 –63.6 NA T2aN2M0, IIIa PR SCC T2aN0M0, IB MPR (5% tumor residue)
5 –38.8 NA T1cN2M0, IIIa PR SCC T0N2M0 MPRc
6 –30.0 –68.3 T3N2M0, IIIb SD SCC T3N0M0, IIA MPR (<10% tumor residue)
7 –49.4 –68.8 T3N2M0, IIIb PR AD T1aN0M0, IA MPR (<10% tumor residue)
8 –33.3 NA T1bN2M0, IIIa PR AD T1aN2M0, IIIA 15–20% tumor residue

a, therapeutic effect of preoperative treatment according to radiologic response; b, histology post-surgery; c, for the fifth case, the primary tumor achieved PCR, but the lymph node of lower lung ligament was positive. y-stage, clinical stage after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy; P-stage, pathological stage; AD, adenocarcinoma; MPR, major pathological response; NA, not available; PCR, pathologic complete response; PR, partial response; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SD, stable disease; SLD, sum of lesion diameter; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value.