Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun;11(6):1587–1594. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-1367

Table 3. Association between EPHA1 expression and clinicopathological factors in patients with gastric cancer.

Characteristic Number of studies Number of patients Pooled OR (95% CI) P value Heterogeneity
I2 (%) P value Model
Age (old vs. young) 3 481 1.02 (0.69–1.52) 0.917 0.0 0.804 Fixed
Sex of patients (male vs. female) 3 481 1.15 (0.74–1.78) 0.539 0.0 0.441 Fixed
Tumor grade (high vs. low) 3 481 1.83 (0.80–4.17) 0.153 76.6 0.014 Random
Tumor stage (high vs. low) 3 481 1.74 (1.15–2.61) 0.008 35.5 0.212 Fixed
Lymph node metastasis (present vs. absent) 3 481 1.88 (1.24–2.87) 0.003 26.8 0.255 Fixed
TNM stage (high vs. low) 2 367 4.98 (1.00–24.91) 0.051 82.2 0.018 Random

EPHA1, ephrin receptor A1; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.