Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 12;20:224. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02423-z

Table 3.

Evidence from SRs or MAs of intervention studies for the association between different interventions for PEH and any health outcome

Author, year Considered health outcome Active treatment/control treatment Number of patients allocated to each treatment No. of included studies per association Random-effects
measure, ES (95% CIs)
Results p value random effects I2 (p value) PIs (95 % CIs) LS AMSTAR-plus
Hyun et al., 2020 [224] Depression Psychological interventions/treatment as usual 236/224 5 SMD: − 0.24 (− 0.49–0.02) Psychological interventions are more effectiver than treatment as usual 0.07 42.6% (0.2) − 0.964–0.491 No 10
Hyun et al., 2020 [224] Anxiety Psychological interventions/treatment as usual 229/215 5 SMD: − 0.25 (− 0.51–0) Psychological interventions are moe effective than treatment as usual 0.05 39.9% (0.28) − 0.967–0.459 No 10

CI confidence interval, ES effect size, LS largest study with significant effect, MA meta-analysis, PI prediction interval, RR risk ratio, SMD standardized mean difference, SR systematic review