Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 28;14:885787. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.885787

Table 2.

The sex-specific relation of diabetes with changes in brain structure in older men and women (N = 893).

Men, n = 447 Women, n = 446 Interactiona p-valueb
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Atrophy
Non-diabetic Ref Ref Ref
Diabetic (model 1) 1.14 (0.60–2.18) 2.16 (1.00–4.67)* 1.22 (0.50–2.94) p = 0.66
Diabetic (model 2) 1.17 (0.60–2.29) 2.46 (1.11–5.42)* 1.32 (0.46–2.79) p = 0.77
Diabetic (model 3) 1.00 (0.51–1.96) 2.18 (1.00–4.72)* 1.17 (0.48–2.87) p = 0.71
WMH
Non-diabetic Ref Ref
Diabetic (model 1) 1.20 (0.76–1.89) 1.11 (0.65–1.89) 0.88 (0.47–4.00) p = 0.70
Diabetic (model 2) 1.15 (0.72–1.84) 1.09 (0.63–1.88) 0.85 (0.45–1.60) p = 0.61
Diabetic (model 3) 1.01 (0.63–1.62) 1.04 (0.61–1.79) 0.78 (0.41–1.49) p = 0.45
Microbleeds
Non-diabetic Ref Ref
Diabetic (model 1) 0.59 (0.26–1.32) 0.82 (0.31–2.20) 1.04 (0.32–3.34) p = 0.67
Diabetic (model 2) 0.65 (0.28–1.49) 0.86 (0.31–2.32) 0.97 (0.30–3.13) p = 0.95
Diabetic (model 3) 0.46 (0.20–1.00 0.75 (0.28–2.03) 0.93 (0.29–3.01) p = 0.90
Lacunes
Non-diabetic Ref Ref
Diabetic (model 1) 1.68 (0.92–3.04) 2.60 (1.24–2.46)* 1.10 (0.49–6.91) p = 0.82
Diabetic (model 2) 1.64 (0.87–3.07) 2.72 (1.24–5.93)* 1.00 (0.41–2.10) p = 0.84
Diabetic (model 3) 1.38 (0.74–2.56) 2.40 (1.13–5.07)* 0.95 (0.37–1.91) p = 0.63

WMH, White Matter Hyperintensities.

Data are presented as OR with (95% CI).

Model 1: adjusted for age.

Model 2: adjusted for age, smoking and alcohol consumption.

Model 3: Adjusted for age, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and presence of CVD (coronary disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, CVA or TIA, peripheral arterial disease).

*p-value < 0.05.

aInteraction term (sex multiplied by diabetes) added to the logistic regression.

bStatistical significance of the interaction term in the logistic regression analysis.