Table 1.
APC | TP53 | KRAS | NRAS | BRAF | EGFR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient 1 | ||||||
Tissue NGS | + | + | ||||
ctDNA – T1* | + | + | + | + | + | |
ctDNA – T2 | + | + | + | + | ||
ctDNA – T3 | + | + | + | + | + | |
Patient 2 | ||||||
Tissue NGS | + | + | ||||
ctDNA – T1* | + | + | ||||
ctDNA – T2 | + | + | ||||
ctDNA – T3 | ||||||
ctDNA – T4 | + | + | + | |||
ctDNA – T5 | ||||||
Patient 3 | ||||||
Tissue NGS | + | + | ||||
ctDNA – T1* | + | + | ||||
ctDNA – T2* | + | + | + | + | ||
ctDNA – T3 | + | + | + | + | ||
ctDNA – T4 | + | + | + | |||
ctDNA – T5 | + | + | + | + | ||
Patient 4 | ||||||
Tissue NGS | + | + | ||||
ctDNA – T1* | + | + | + | |||
ctDNA – T2 | + | + | + | + | ||
ctDNA – T3 | + | + | + | + | + | |
ctDNA – T4 | + | + | + | + | + | |
Patient 5 | ||||||
Tissue NGS | + | + | ||||
ctDNA – T1* | + | + | + | |||
ctDNA – T2 | + | + | + | |||
ctDNA – T3 | + | + | + | |||
Patient 6 | ||||||
Tissue NGS | + | + | ||||
ctDNA – T1* | + | + | + | + | ||
ctDNA – T2 | + | + | + | + | ||
ctDNA – T3 | + | + | + | + |
Known acquired mechanisms of resistance were noted in all the cases. The sub-clones were noted to be polyclonal, and the number of clones varied over time. Some clones disappeared over time during non-EGFR-based therapy (EGFR holiday such as KRAS clones in patient 2, BRAF clones in patient 3, and EGFR clones in patient 4.