Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 28;13:914653. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.914653

Table 3.

Impact of conventional urea, neem-coated urea, and zinc-coated urea on a number of unfilled grains per panicle, grain yield per plant, total biomass per plant, and harvest index of rice plant grown in aerobic and anaerobic regimes.

Treatments Unfilled grains per panicle Grain yield per plant (g)
Aerobic regime Anaerobic regime Mean (UF) Aerobic regimes Anaerobic regime Mean (UF)
Control 28 25 26.5 A 11.00 13.00 12.00 C
Urea 25 16 20.5 B 16.00 18.33 17.16 B
Neem coated 18 14 16.0 C 18.33 20.00 19.16 B
Zn coated 14 10 12.0 D 20.33 23.66 22.00 A
Mean (IR) 21.25 A 16.25 B 16.41 B 18.75 A
HSD IR = 2.405, UF = 2.609, IR × UF = NS IR = 1.468, UF = 2.813, IR × UF = NS
Treatments Total biomass per plant (g) Harvest index (%)
Aerobic regime Anaerobic regime Mean (UF) Aerobic regimes Anaerobic regime Mean (UF)
Control 29.66 31.33 30.50 D 37.08 41.49 39.34 A
Urea 43.00 47.00 45.00 C 37.21 39.0 38.13 B
Neem coated 50.00 55.00 52.50 B 36.66 36.36 36.49 C
Zn coated 60.00 65.00 62.50 A 33.88 36.4 35.2 D
Mean (IR) 45.66 B 49.58 A 36.21 B 37.81 A
HSD IR = 3.724, UR = 7.136, IR × UF = NS IR = 1.084, UF = 0.648, IR × UF = NS

IR, irrigation regimes; UF, urea fertilizers; mean values having the same alphabet did not differ significantly at p = 0.05.