Table 2.
Ranking of the 20 most impactful and trending articles (sorted by TLC)
| Rank | Author(s)/year | TLC | TLC/t | TGC | TGC/t | TLCe |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campbell and Li (2008) | 12 | 0.86 | 110 | 7.86 | 4 |
| 2 | Swami et al. (2010) | 10 | 0.83 | 21 | 1.75 | 3 |
| 3 | Duru and Poyrazli (2011) | 10 | 0.91 | 28 | 2.55 | 7 |
| 4 | Yang et al. (2006) | 9 | 0.56 | 93 | 5.81 | 1 |
| 5 | Fritz et al. (2008) | 9 | 0.64 | 77 | 5.50 | 4 |
| 6 | Sam (2001) | 8 | 0.38 | 115 | 5.48 | 2 |
| 7 | Pitts (2009) | 8 | 0.62 | 62 | 4.77 | 1 |
| 8 | Ying and Liese (1994) | 7 | 0.25 | 47 | 1.68 | 0 |
| 9 | Perrucci and Hu (1995) | 7 | 0.26 | 63 | 2.33 | 1 |
| 10 | Zhang and Goodson (2011) | 7 | 0.64 | 53 | 4.82 | 0 |
| 11 | Sawir et al. (2012) | 7 | 0.70 | 50 | 5.00 | 5 |
| 12 | Wang and Hannes (2014) | 7 | 0.88 | 27 | 3.38 | 3 |
| 13 | Akhtar and Kröner-Herwig (2015) | 7 | 1.00 | 31 | 4.43 | 2 |
| 14 | Yu and Shen (2012) | 6 | 0.60 | 31 | 3.10 | 4 |
| 15 | Yu (2013) | 6 | 0.67 | 15 | 1.67 | 3 |
| 16 | Young and Schartner (2014) | 6 | 0.75 | 21 | 2.63 | 4 |
| 17 | Rui and Wang (2015) | 6 | 0.86 | 31 | 4.43 | 4 |
| 18 | Zimmermann (1995) | 5 | 0.19 | 62 | 2.30 | 2 |
| 19 | Pedersen et al. (2011) | 5 | 0.45 | 36 | 3.27 | 3 |
| 20 | Hotta and Ting-Toomey (2013) | 5 | 0.56 | 39 | 4.33 | 2 |
All indices retrieved from HistCite: TLC, total local citations received; TLC/t, average local citations received per year; TGC, total global citations received; TGC/t, average global citations received per year; TLC/e, trending local citations at the end of the period covered