Selection | ||
1 | Did the authors present their reasons for selecting or recruiting the number of people included or analysed? | |
0. No | ||
1. Yes | ||
2 | Was the study sample likely to be representative of the study population? | |
0. Nonprobability sampling (including purposive, quota, convenience, and snowball sampling) | ||
1. Probability sampling (including simple random, systematic, stratified random, cluster, two-stage, and multistage sampling) | ||
3 | Was the dentist satisfaction survey valid and reliable? | |
0. No | ||
1. Yes | ||
4 | Was a response rate proper? | |
0. No | ||
1. Yes | ||
Confounding factors | ||
5 | Were there any considerations for important disturbance variables, such as age or sex, related to dental job satisfaction? | |
0. No | ||
1. Yes | ||
Outcome | ||
6 | Was the measurement tool used for assessment of outcome (overall job satisfaction and related factors) valid and reliable? | |
0. No | ||
1. Yes | ||
7 | Was the statistical adjustment adequately performed? (ie, The effect of confounders when evaluating the influence of independent variables on dental job satisfaction) | |
0. No | ||
1. Yes | ||
8 | Was the evaluation performed independently by 2 raters blinded to each other? | |
0. No | ||
1. Yes | ||
Methodological Appraisal Score | ||
Bad | Satisfactory | Good |
0%-33 % | 34%-66 % | 67-100 % |
0 = no or not reported; 1 = yes.
Note. Scoring: Total score divided by total number of items multiplied by 100.
Quality appraisal score: weak: 0%-33.9%, moderate: 34%-66.9%, and strong: 67%-100%.