Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 8;114(7):969–978. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac071

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariable models for mortality analysis

Baseline covariates OR for univariate model (95% CI) P OR for multivariable model (95% CI) P
Age
 ≥80 y vs <80 y 1.01 (0.58 to 1.78) .94
ASA scorea
 3-4 vs 1–2 3.27 (1.76 to 6.09) <.001
CACI
 ≥7 vs 3–6 2.68 (1.54 to 4.63) <.001 2.46 (1.39 to 4.32) .002
fTRSTa
 ≥2 vs <2 2.24 (1.30 to 3.87) .004
G8 scorea
 ≤14 vs >14 2.80 (1.30 to 6.01) .008
PS ECOGa
 ≥2 vs 0–1 2.57 (1.39 to 4.77) .003
Nutritional risk screening
 Mildly impaired vs normal 1.78 (0.94 to 3.35) .07 1.64 (0.85 to 3.17) .13
 Mod + sev impaired vs normal 3.36 (1.63 to 6.95) .001 2.67 (1.27 to 5.66) .01
TUGa
 >20 s vs ≤20 s 3.62 (1.51 to 8.67) .004
Surgical approach
Open vs minimally invasive or robotic 2.87 (1.64 to 5.02) <.001 2.45 (1.35 to 4.46) .003
Type of surgeryb
 Palliative vs curative 4.69 (2.19 to 10.00) <.001
Site of disease
 Other site of disease vs lower GI 1.42 (0.81 to 2.48) .21 1.13 (0.61 to 2.08) .67
a

During stepwise process, this variable was not included due to association with CACI. ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; CACI = Charlson Age Comorbidity Index; CI = confidence interval; fTRST = Flemish version of the Triage Risk Screening Tool; G8 = Geriatric 8; GI = gastrointestinal; mod + sev = moderately and severely; OR = odds ratio; PS ECOG=Performance Status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; TUG = timed up and go.

b

During stepwise process, this variable was not included due to association with surgical approach.