Skip to main content
. 2022 May 13;101(18):e29191. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029191

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of all included studies.

Sample size Ocular axial length Axial elongation (mm
First author Language Control Trial Age (Years) Follow-up time (month) Control Trial AL measuring instrument SER (D) Control Trial
Tang WT[14] Chinese 41 43 11.05 ± 2.13 12 24.71 ± 0.37 24.69 ± 0.34 IOL master −4.92 ± 1.21/−4.90 ± 1.16 0.20 ± 0.05 0.12 ± 0.03
Shi YH[15] Chinese 89 86 12.5 ± 3.6 6 24.95 ± 0.17 24.87 ± 0.22 AL-scan −3.34 ± 0.78/−3.31 ± 0.79 0.25 ± 0.11 0.11 ± 0.09
Shi MH[16] Chinese 66 62 10.88 ± 1.34/11.06 ± 1.50 12 24.99 ± 0.66 24.85 ± 0.48 IOL master −3.29 ± 0.89/−3.27 ± 0.82 0.22 ± 0.08 0.12 ± 0.07
Luo Y[18] Chinese 60 60 10.77 ± 1.91/10.02 ± 2.35 12 25.24 ± 0.75 25.26 ± 0.76 A-mode ultrasound −2.95 ± 1.25/−3.00 ± 1.32 0.22 ± 0.21 0.13 ± 0.19
Chen Z[19] English 36 37 8.9 ± 1.4/8.8 ± 1.2 12 24.26 ± 0.90 24.49 ± 0.95 IOL master  − 2.38 ± 1.10/ − 2.85 ± 1.08 0.30 ± 0.11 0.21 ± 0.15
Kinoshita N[20] English 35 38 10.37 ± 1.65/10.33 ± 1.59 24 24.86 ± 0.81 24.69 ± 0.58 IOL master −2.72 ± 1.31/−2.60 ± 1.29 0.40 ± 0.23 0.29 ± 0.20
Kinoshita N[21] English 20 20 10.40 ± 1.86/10.87 ± 1.38 12 24.95 ± 0.92 24.73 ± 0.58 IOL master −2.95 ± 1.43/−2.81 ± 1.43 0.19 ± 0.15 0.09 ± 0.12
Tan Q[22] English 30 29 9.0 ± 1.2/9.0 ± 1.2 12 24.59 ± 0.80 24.50 ± 0.61 IOL master −2.84 ± 0.96/−2.65 ± 0.92 0.16 ± 0.15 0.07 ± 0.16
Vincent SJ[23] English 28 25 9.1 ± 1.1/8.9 ± 1.2 6 24.44 ± 0.84 24.38 ± 0.62 IOL master −2.58 ± 0.91/−2.38 ± 0.81 0.05 ± 0.08 0.01 ± 0.12

AL = axial length, D = degree, SER = spherical equivalent refractive.