Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 18;26(7):4769–4780. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04441-w

Table 4.

Multiple multinomial regression models of factors associated with the presence of mid-buccal RT1 or mid-buccal RT2/RT3 gingival recessions in at least one tooth (adjusted for gender)

OR 95% CI P value
At least 1 RT1 recession (subjects without RT2 and RT3 recessions)
Age groups (years)
20–39 0.498 0.254–0.976 0.042
40–59 0.752 0.405–1.394 0.365
60–75 Ref Ref Ref
Education level
Low 0.510 0.280–0.929 0.028
Middle 0.819 0.479–1.399 0.465
High Ref Ref Ref
Periodontal status
No periodontitis 1.022 0.490–2.133 0.954
Moderate periodontitis 1.411 0.728–2.737 0.308
Severe periodontitis Ref Ref Ref
FMPS (%)
< 30 2.401 1.229–4.692 0.010
30–60 2.108 0.924–3.631 0.087
> 60 Ref Ref Ref
At least 1 RT2 or RT3 recession
Age groups (years)
20–39 0.184 0.102–0.334 <0.001
40–59 0.536 0.340–0.845 0.007
60–75 Ref Ref Ref
Education level
Low 1.866 1.087–3.204 0.024
Middle 1.867 1.075–3.244 0.027
High Ref Ref Ref
Periodontal status
No periodontitis 0.023 0.010–0.054 <0.001
Moderate periodontitis 0.273 0.179–0.415 <0.001
Severe periodontitis Ref Ref Ref
FMPS (%)
< 30 0.740 0.547–0.953 0.047
30–60 1.238 0.812–1.886 0.322
> 60 Ref Ref Ref

GR, gingival recession; OR, odds ratio; 95% IC, 95% confidence interval; ref, reference