Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 6.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Methods. 2022 Jan 13;27(5):874–894. doi: 10.1037/met0000283

Table 4.

Estimated effect of walking suggestion / anti-sedentary suggestion on proximal outcome, moderated by location (home/work or other)

Variable Estimate 95% LCL 95% UCL SE Hotelling t p
Intercept α 0 1.715 1.461 1.968 0.124 191.3 <0.001
Past 30-minute step count α 1 0.414 0.351 0.477 0.031 182.0 <0.001
At home/work α 2 0.143 −0.083 0.368 0.110 1.67 0.205
Walking Suggestion β 0 0.050 −0.167 0.267 0.106 0.22 0.640
Walking Suggestion x At home/work β 1 0.377 0.001 0.753 0.184 4.18 0.049
Anti-sedentary Suggestion β 2 0.092 −0.166 0.351 0.127 0.53 0.472
Anti-sedentary Suggestion x At home/work β 3 −0.142 −0.540 0.256 0.195 0.53 0.472

Note. LCL (UCL) represents lower (upper) confidence limit. SE represents standard error. LCL, UCL, SE, and p are corrected for small sample size using method in (Liao et al., 2016; Mancl & DeRouen, 2001). The degrees-of-freedom for the Hotelling t test is (1, 30).