Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 22;15(2):299–310. doi: 10.3233/PRM-190671

Table 5.

Correlation matrix of construct validity correlations

Communication domain Mobility domain** Self-care domain domain
Reported by Parents SLT Health worker Rehabilitation specialist Occupational therapist Pediatric physical therapist Parents and SLT
Scale ICS1 CFCS2 VSS3 CAP4 MACS5 GMFCS6 FOIS7
Communication domain Reported on p-RDA: function level* –0.85 (n = 29) 0.69 (n = 30) 0.82 (n = 30) 0.78 (n = 29) 0.49 (n = 23) 0.49 (n = 24) –0.76 (n = 29)
95 % CI –0.94 – –0.67 0.41–0.85 0.62–0.92 0.54–0.90 0.07–0.76 0.08–0.76 –0.50 – –0.89
p-RDA: activity level* –0.82 (n = 29) 0.87 (n = 30) 0.92 (n = 30) 0.77 (n = 29) 0.60 (n = 23) 0.60 (n = 24) –0.71 (n = 29)
95% CI –0.92 – –0.62 0.71–0.94 0.79–0.96 0.52–0.90 0.21–0.82 0.22–0.82 –0.42 – –0.86

1ICS = Intelligibility in Context Scale; 2CFCS = Communication Function Classification System; 3VSS = Viking Speech scale; 4CAP = Capacity Profile Voice and speech; 5MACS = Manual Ability Classification System; 6GMFCS = Gross Motor Function Classification System; 7FOIS = Functional Oral Intake Scale. *Data are presented as Spearman correlation coefficients. **No linear association was found between the p-RDA severity scales and the Vignos and Brooke scale (n = 6 children), and therefore correlations with the Spearman correlation coefficient could not be reported.