Table 2.
Abstainers, n=517 | Continued Smokers, n=533 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | No. | % | No. | % | P * |
Site of primary tumor | |||||
Nasopharynx | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | .87 |
Oropharynx | 11† | 64.7 | 20 | 60.6 | |
Hypopharynx | 1 | 5.8 | 3 | 9.1 | |
Larynx | 5 | 29.4 | 9 | 27.3 | |
Tumor grade/differentiation ‡ | |||||
Well/moderately well | 2 | 11.8 | 3 | 9.1 | .53 |
Moderate | 7 | 41.1 | 17 | 51.5 | |
Poor/moderately poor | 7 | 41.1 | 8 | 24.2 | |
Tumor classification | |||||
T0-T2 | 7 | 41.1 | 18 | 54.5 | .37 |
T3-T4 | 10 | 58.9 | 15 | 45.5 | |
Lymph node status | |||||
N0 | 5 | 29.4 | 11 | 33.3 | .78 |
N1-N3 | 12 | 70.6 | 22 | 66.7 | |
Overall stage | |||||
I | 2 | 11.8 | 4 | 12.1 | .44 |
II | 0 | 0 | 4 | 12.1 | |
III | 5 | 29.4 | 6 | 18.1 | |
IV | 10 | 58.8 | 19 | 57.7 | |
Treatment | |||||
XRT alone | 7 | 41.1 | 10 | 30.3 | .57 |
Ind. CTX→XRT | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9.1 | |
Concurrent CTX-XRT | 7 | 41.1 | 15 | 45.5 | |
Ind. CTX→CTX-XRT | 3 | 17.8 | 5 | 15.1 | |
No CTX | 7 | 41.1 | 10 | 30.3 | .44 |
Received CTX | 10 | 58.8 | 23 | 69.7 | |
Variable | Mean ± SD | Median (Range) | Mean ± SD | Median (Range) | P |
Radiation dose, Gy | 68.3 ± 3.3 | 70 (63–72) | 68.9 ± 4.3 | 70 (48–72) | .65 |
No. of radiation fractions | 32.9 ± 3.17 | 33 (30–42) | 33.2 ± 5.0 | 33 (12–42) | .84 |
Radiation schedule, d | 44.2 ± 4.3 | 44 (39–51) | 43.9 ± 2.9 | 44 (38–51) | .40 |
Follow-up, d | 533.4 ± 227.4 | 519 (103–1026) | 515.8 ± 395.0 | 395.7 (111–1210) | .60 |
XRT indicates radiation therapy; CTX, chemotherapy; Ind., induction; SD, standard deviation; Gy, grays.
The chi-square or the Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables, as appropriate, and t tests were used to compare means (with adjustment for unequal variances, as appropriate) for continuous variables.
Includes 1 patient who had cervical metastasis of unknown primary origin. Radiation fields for this patient were consistent with oropharyngeal fields.
Tumor grade was not recorded for 1 abstainer and for 5 continued smokers; moderately to well differentiated was listed as well differentiated, and moderately to poorly differentiated was listed as poorly differentiated.