Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 6;2022:8316106. doi: 10.1155/2022/8316106

Table 2.

Detailed results of subgroup analysis.

Treatment Pla Sul Toc Sec Ixe Net Bim Ris Ust Fil Tof Upa Eta Inf Ada Cer Gol
RR (95% CI) for ASAS40 response Reference 1.18 (0.76, 1.82) 0.60 (0.22, 1.67) 1.87 (1.28, 2.73) 2.41 (1.73, 3.34) 2.22 (1.14, 4.32) 3.44 (1.53, 7.76) 1.50 (0.62, 3.63) 0.90 (0.61, 1.33) 2.00 (0.94, 4.23) 1.72 (0.97, 3.03) 2.02 (1.14, 3.59) 2.25 (1.72, 2.94) 3.63 (2.23, 5.91) 2.44 (1.80, 3.31) 3.58 (2.37, 5.39) 2.52 (1.89, 3.38)
SUCRA for ASAS40 response, % 12.7 20.4 4.8 44.6 64.3 58.2 83.3 35.4 9.1 51.2 40.4 51.6 58.6 89.8 66.3 89.5 69.2
RR (95% CI) for incidence of SAEs Reference 1.05 (0.57, 1.96) 1.00 (0.02, 49.45) 0.56 (0.10, 3.07) 0.20 (0.01, 2.72) 2.78 (0.93, 8.30) 1.00 (0.02, 48.28) 1.97 (0.18, 21.13) 0.14 (0.01, 2.68) 0.95 (0.17, 5.27) 3.00 (0.12, 72.15) 0.33 (0.04, 3.04) 0.67 (0.12, 3.94) 0.33 (0.10, 1.04) 2.18 (1.02, 4.68) 3.99 (0.05, 322.63) 0.55 (0.08, 3.67)
SUCRA for incidence of SAEs, % 49.0 54.1 16.8 64.9 62.8 49.3 81.7 66.9 71.6 27.5 67.4 48.4 39.6 54.4 32.8 23.2 39.5

RR: risk ratio; SMD: standardized mean difference; CIs: confidence intervals; SUCRA: surface under the cumulative ranking area; Pla: placebo; Sul: sulfasalazine; Toc: tocilizumab; Sec: secukinumab; Ixe: ixekizumab; Net: netakimab; Bim: bimekizumab; Ris: risankizumab; Ust: ustekinumab; Fil: filgotinib; Tof: tofacitinib; Upa: upadacitinib; Eta: etanercept; Inf: infliximab; Ada: adalimumab; Cer: certolizumab pegol; Gol: golimumab.