Table 3.
Results of meta-analysis on recurrence rate.
| Study or subgroup | Radio frequency group | Laser group | Weight | Odds ratio, M-H, fixed, 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Events | Total | Events | Total | |||
| Semmler et al. | 12 | 93 | 11 | 93 | 36.24% | 0.74 [0.21, 2.06] |
| Liu Jianyong et al. | 1 | 42 | 3 | 42 | 9.21% | 0.13 [0.03, 2.87] |
| Jun et al. | 2 | 47 | 1 | 46 | 1.67% | 4.98 [0.23, 1113.13] |
| Jinhui and Chengyu | 7 | 64 | 5 | 64 | 17.35% | 1.784 [0.36, 4.56] |
| Yuke et al. | 2 | 52 | 5 | 52 | 5.29% | 0.36 [0.08, 2.08] |
| Yong et al. | 2 | 48 | 3 | 47 | 5.12% | 0.53 [0.08, 6.14] |
| Bin et al. | 1 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 25.12% | 0.754 [0.42, 1.89] |
| Total (95% CI) | 379 | 377 | 100.00% | 0.80 [0.35, 1.29] | ||
| Total events | 27 | 28 | ||||
Heterogeneity: chi2 = 4.82, df = 7 (P = 0.624); I2 = 0%. Test for overall effect: Z = 0.88 (P = 0.371).