Extended Data Table 2.
qpWave tests of dog cladality
| Target sets | Individuals | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern dogs | Karelia_Veretye.OL4061, Zhokhov.CGG6, PortauChoix.AL3194, Baikal.OL4223, NewGuineaSingingDog | ||||
| Southwestern dogs | Israel.THRZ02, Iran.AL2571, Israel.ASHQ01, Basenji | ||||
| Ancient reference sets | Individuals | ||||
| Ancient small (n=7) | Siberia_UlakhanSular.LOW008, Germany_Aufhausener.AH575, Germany_HohleFels.JK2183, Siberia_BungeToll.CGG29, Siberia_BelayaGora.IN18_016, Yukon_QuartzCreek.SC19.MCJ010, Altai_Razboinichya.AL2744 | ||||
| Ancient large (n=25) | Germany_Aufhausener.AH574, Germany_Aufhausener.AH577, Siberia_Yana.CGG27, Siberia_Badyarikha.CGG34, Alaska_Fairbanks.JAL385, Alaska_Fairbanks.JAL48, Alaska_Fairbanks.JAL65, Alaska_Fairbanks.JAL69, Yukon_HunkerCreek.SC19.MCJ017, Germany_HohleFels.JK2174, Germany_HohleFels.JK2175, Germany_HohleFels.JK2183, Siberia_BungeToll.LOW003, Siberia_UlakhanSular.LOW008, Czechia_Predmosti.PDM100, Alaska_LillianCreek.ALAS_024, Siberia_Tirekhtyakh.VAL_033, Siberia_Badyarikha.VAL_008, Siberia_Ogorokha.VAL_050, Siberia_BelayaGora.IN18_016, Siberia_Tirekhtyakh.CGG32 | ||||
| Target | Reference set | p rank 0 | p rank 1 | p rank 2 | |
| Eastern dogs | Ancient small | 0.3667 | 0.9566 | 0.9992 | |
| Southwestern dogs | Ancient small | 0.0229 | 0.8850 | 0.8474 | |
| Eastern+Southwestern | Ancient small | 6.1E-05 | 0.1900 | 0.7610 | |
| Eastern dogs | Ancient large | 0.0656 | 0.5352 | 0.8292 | |
| Southwestern dogs | Ancient large | 0.1622 | 0.8989 | 0.9525 | |
| Eastern+Southwestern | Ancient large | 9.2E-18 | 2.9E-04 | 0.0659 | |
| Modern reference sets | Individuals | ||||
| Base modern | WolfSaudiArabia, WolfSyria, Wolf01Altai, Wolf02Chukotka, Wolf03Bryansk, Wolf04InnerMongolia, Wolf05China, Wolf06Croatia, Wolf07Israel, Wolf19India, Wolf20Iran, Wolf21Italy, Wolf24Portugal, Wolf27Spain, Wolf31Liaoning, Wolf32Xinjiang, Wolf33Xinjiang, Wolf34Shanxi, Wolf35Xinjiang, Wolf36Xinjiang, Wolf37InnerMongolia, Wolf38Shanxi, Wolf39Iberia, Wolf41InnerMongolia, Wolf42Tibet, WolfTibetan01InnerMongolia, WolfTibetan02InnerMongolia, WolfTibetan03QinghaiHighland, WolfTibetan04QinghaiHighland, WolfTibetan05Tibet, WolfTibetan06Tibet, WolfTibetan07Xinjiang, WolfTibetan08Xinjiang, Wolf21-M-02-15Scandinavia, Wolf32-D-05-18Scandinavia | ||||
| Target | Reference set | p rank 0 (mean log across reps) | p rank 0: max | p rank 1 (mean log across reps) | p rank 1: max |
| Eastern dogs | (Sample of n=7 from base) x100 reps | 2.5E-11 | 0.0214 | 0.2643 | 0.9576 |
| Southwestern dogs | (Sample of n=7 from base) x100 reps | 0.0474 | 0.9247 | 0.3226 | 0.9990 |
| Eastern+Southwestern | (Sample of n=7 from base) x100 reps | 6.7E-77 | 1.2E-11 | 3.0E-05 | 0.4611 |
| Eastern dogs | (Sample of n=25 from base) x100 reps | 2.2E-46 | 1.1E-23 | 0.0033 | 0.3526 |
| Southwestern dogs | (Sample of n=25 from base) x100 reps | 7.1E-06 | 0.0525 | 0.0427 | 0.8939 |
| Eastern+Southwestern | (Sample of n=25 from base) x100 reps | 1.0E-100 | 1.0E-100 | 1.2E-54 | 1.0E-06 |
Two different dog target sets, and their union, are tested for cladality relative to reference sets consisting of ancient or modern wolves. From the modern wolves (bottom of table), for each target 100 different reference sets were constructed by randomly sampling either 7 or 25 individuals. The results across these 100 tests are summarised by displaying the mean (on a log-scale) and maximum p-values.