Figure 6.

The outcome for a conservation objective was typically worse when we planned to address other, single objectives than when we simultaneously considered all objectives in the Protect Habitat scenario. Each figure shows the conservation value of the priority areas as a proportion of the best, single-objective outcome for that conservation objective, comparing the outcome from single-objective prioritizations for each of the other five objectives (bars) to the outcome from the multi-objective approach (dashed line). We used a critical habitat target of 40% of the Boreal Shield sub-population’s range in undisturbed habitat and a target of 65% for each of the remaining 50 sub-populations, and then ran additional analyses at 25, 50, and 75% of each critical habitat target.