Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;9:870808. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.870808

Table 1.

Potential cut-off to predict raised intracranial pressure.

Study No of patients Methods of evaluation ONSD cut-off point Sensitivity Specificity
Kimberly et al. (13) 15 Linear ultrasoud probe (axial B-Scan) 5 mm 88%
(95% CI:
47–99%)
93%
(95% CI:
78–99%)
Adauayi et al. (14) 160 (80 controls) Linear ultrasoud probe (axial B-Scan) 5.2 mm 81.2%
(95% CI:
69.9–89.6%)
100%
(95% CI:
71.5–100%)
Lee et al. (15) 134 Linear ultrasoud probe (transverse B-Scan) 5.5 mm (in Korean population) 99%
(95% CI:
93–100%)
85%
(95% CI:
66–95%)
Bolesch et al. (16) 45 Linear ultrasoud probe (transvere B-Scan) 5.7 mm 53.5% 100.0%
Salahuddin et al. (17) 102 Linear ultrasoud probe (transverse B-Scan) 5.7 mm (non-traumatic cerebral edema) 84%
(95% CI:
70–87%)
71%
(95% CI:
70–87%)
Wang et al. (18) 279 Linear ultrasoud probe (transverse and sagittal B-Scan) 4.1 mm (in Chinese population) 95% 92%
Komut et al. (19) 100 Linear ultrasoud probe (transverse and sagittal B-Scan) 4.7 mm 70% 86%
Moretti et al. (20) 63 Linear ultrasoud probe (transverse and sagittal B-Scan) 5.2 mm (in intracranial hemorrhages) 93%
(95% CI:
77.2–99%)
74%
(95% CI:
61.5–84%)
Moretti et al. (21) 53 Linear ultrasoud probe (transverse and sagittal B-Scan) 5.2 mm (in intracranial hemorrhages) 94%
(95% CI:
88–100%)
76%
(95% CI:
65–87%)
Major et al. (22) 26 Linear ultrasoud probe (B-Scan, with no specified plane) Not detected 86%
(95% CI:
42–99%)
100%
(95% CI:
79–100%)

ONSD, Optic nerve sheath diameter. 95% CI: 95% Confidence intervals.