Table 2.
Area | Research need | Example |
Natural history | Better understanding of onset of disease and natural history of EoE in both treated and untreated individuals | Long-term follow-up data in treated patients |
Cause of EoE | Understand better the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying cause of disease | Better understanding of genetic predisposition and disease triggers |
Clinical presentation | Validated symptom questionnaires for disease monitoring | Use of EEsAI and HRQoL |
Diagnosis | Clearer definition of histological disease diagnosis | Assess value of mast cell activity, fibroblast activity and density of submucosal fibrosis |
Less invasive methods of disease detection | Cytosponge or string test, transnasal endoscopy | |
Potential of systemic biomarkers of disease | Blood messenger RNA levels of CD101 and CD274 expressing eosinophils | |
Assessment of the timing and value of stopping a PPI before a diagnostic biopsy | Current advice on 3 weeks gap needs further study | |
The relevance of allergy testing in EoE | Value of testing for treatment of symptoms in other organs | |
Management | Comparisons of therapeutic strategies and which one to use as first line options | Using standardised symptom questionnaires to distinguish optimum initial therapy |
Role of novel biologics in the management algorithm | Use of drugs such as dupilimab, benralizumab and cendakimab in both steroid naïve and steroid unresponsive patients | |
Prevention of EoE | Long-term outcomes of each therapeutic option with comparison of efficacy and side effects | Follow-up data of patients on therapy |
Prognosis | The value of achieving deep remission versus remission and threshold levels of their definition | Value of suppressing eosinophil count <5 eosinophils/0.3 mm2 compared with <15 eosinophils/0.3 mm2 |
EEsAI, Eosinophilic Esophagitis symptom Assessment Index; EoE, eosinophilic oesophagitis; HRQoL, health-related quality of life; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.