Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 26;29(5):3432–3439. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.02.040

Table 5.

Effect of (YP) substitution on pan and pita bread quality characteristics.

Sample Loaf weight(g) Loaf volume (cm3) Specific volume(cm3/g) Water activity
Pan bread
Control 489.00 ± 1.00d 2580.00 ± 15.20a 5.28 ± 0.17a 0.693 ± 0.01c
YP 5% 505.66 ± 2.02c 2239.66 ± 3.05b 4.43 ± 0.98b 0.702 ± 0.02b
YP 10% 513.00 ± 2.00b 1400.00 ± 5.00d 2.73 ± 0.01d 0.706 ± 0.03b
YP 15% 517.33 ± 4.02a 1570.00 ± 12.01c 3.03 ± 0.02c 0.726 ± 0.03a
Pita bread
Control 131.00 ± 1.00c 291.00 ± 15.20a 2.28 ± 0.08a 0.653 ± 0.01b
YP 5% 135.66 ± 2.02b 283.66 ± 3.05b 2.43 ± 0.02b 0.747 ± 0.02a
YP 10% 137.00 ± 2.00b 279.00 ± 5.00b 2.23 ± 0.01a 0.751 ± 0.01a
YP 15% 140.33 ± 4.02a 273.00 ± 12.01c 1.93 ± 0.09c 0.756 ± 0.03a

Values followed by different letters were significantly different at p < 0.05.