Table 5.
Effect of (YP) substitution on pan and pita bread quality characteristics.
| Sample | Loaf weight(g) | Loaf volume (cm3) | Specific volume(cm3/g) | Water activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pan bread | ||||
| Control | 489.00 ± 1.00d | 2580.00 ± 15.20a | 5.28 ± 0.17a | 0.693 ± 0.01c |
| YP 5% | 505.66 ± 2.02c | 2239.66 ± 3.05b | 4.43 ± 0.98b | 0.702 ± 0.02b |
| YP 10% | 513.00 ± 2.00b | 1400.00 ± 5.00d | 2.73 ± 0.01d | 0.706 ± 0.03b |
| YP 15% | 517.33 ± 4.02a | 1570.00 ± 12.01c | 3.03 ± 0.02c | 0.726 ± 0.03a |
| Pita bread | ||||
| Control | 131.00 ± 1.00c | 291.00 ± 15.20a | 2.28 ± 0.08a | 0.653 ± 0.01b |
| YP 5% | 135.66 ± 2.02b | 283.66 ± 3.05b | 2.43 ± 0.02b | 0.747 ± 0.02a |
| YP 10% | 137.00 ± 2.00b | 279.00 ± 5.00b | 2.23 ± 0.01a | 0.751 ± 0.01a |
| YP 15% | 140.33 ± 4.02a | 273.00 ± 12.01c | 1.93 ± 0.09c | 0.756 ± 0.03a |
Values followed by different letters were significantly different at p < 0.05.