Table 5.
Path co-efficient analysis showing direct (diagonal) and indirect effects of different quantitative traits on no. of fruits/plant in M1 and normal tomato population of 50 different genotypes.
Control |
150 Gy |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH | NFC | NF | Correlation with yield | PH | NFC | NF | Correlation with yield | ||
PH | 0.013 | 0.005 | 0.442 | 0.46 | PH | −0.020 | −0.008 | 0.764 | 0.74 |
NFC | 0.006 | 0.009 | 0.984 | 0.87 | NFC | −0.015 | −0.012 | 1.025 | 0.71 |
NF | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.851 | 1.00 | NF | −0.009 | −0.018 | 0.732 | 1.00 |
Residual effect = 0.0003 | Residual Effect = 0.0059 | ||||||||
300 Gy | Correlation with yield | 450 Gy | Correlation with yield | ||||||
PH | NFC | NF | PH | NFC | NF | ||||
PH | −0.005 | 0.001 | −0.405 | −0.41 | PH | −0.443 | 0.655 | −0.464 | −0.25 |
NFC | 0.002 | −0.002 | 0.990 | 0.91 | NFC | −0.097 | 2.066 | −2.121 | 0.11 |
NF | 0.003 | −0.002 | 0.905 | 0.99 | NF | −0.131 | 2.217 | −1.976 | −0.15 |
Residual Effect = 0.0182 | Residual Effect = 0.324 |
PH = Plant height, NFC = No. of flower clusters, NF = No. of flowers.