Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences logoLink to Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
. 2022 Mar 5;29(5):3654–3660. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.03.003

Floristic composition of Jandaf Mountain as biodiversity hotspot area in southwestern Saudi Arabia

Ali A Al-Namazi a, Saeed M Algarni b,d, Justin SH Wan c, Mobarak S Al Mosallam a,⁎, Fahad Alotaibi a
PMCID: PMC9280213  PMID: 35844416

Abstract

Arid environments around the world are characterized by lower plant diversity. However, some specific locations have relatively high species richness and have significant importance in terms of vegetation structure and plant diversity. Jabal Al-Jandaf is located in an arid area within the eastern side of mountainous region in the southwest of Saudi Arabia. It consists of valleys, lower plain and upper plain habitats with unique and diverse vegetation. These habitats range from 1000 m above sea level near the Tarj valley to 1910 m at the summit. In this study, we conducted a first survey of the floristic diversity at Jandaf Mountain. Furthermore, we applied the criteria of the Important Plant Area (IPA) and the High Conservation Value (HCV) approaches to assess whether the plant community at Jandaf Mountain qualifies as a significant conservation area. We found that the study area has great plant diversity with plant composition varying among the different habitats (e.g., valleys, upper and lower elevations) within the study area. We recorded 118 species from 97 genera belonging to 42 families, including endemic (e.g. Aloe pseudorubroviolacea), near-endemic (e.g. Monolluma quadrangular), and endangered species (e.g. Dracaena serrulata, Combretum molle, and Moringa peregrine). The plant diversity at Jandaf Mountain achieves the criteria outlined in the IPA and HCV approaches. Therefore, we conclude that Jandaf Mountain has a unique vegetation structure, and the area qualifies for conservation as a high value area for biodiversity and conservation of global significance.

Keywords: Arid environment, Endangered species, Mountainous habitat, Rare species, Threatened species

1. Introduction

Mountainous areas often have high botanical significance in biodiversity and endemism, where species tend to be spatially limited to particular elevations or habitats (Noroozi et al., 2018). Within mountainous areas, each individual mountain and valley may have species that occur nowhere else in the world. For example, the mountains of Northwest Yunnan, China, were found to have a unique vegetation composition with high species richness (Sherman et al., 2007). Vegetation composition on mountains may also be stratified with different sets of species occurring across different elevations (Hall et al., 2009, Al-Namazi et al., 2021). The relative high diversity of these mountains gives them a high botanical importance and makes an absolute necessity for these habitats to be protected (Kollmair et al., 2005).

The mountains of Sarawat (part of the Asir Mountains in southwestern Saudi Arabia) hold the greatest proportion of plant species diversity compared to other habitats in Saudi Arabia (which represent about 60% of plant species; Collenette, 1999, Seraj et al., 2014). Vegetation and species distributions are strongly influenced by geological heterogeneity. A greater extent of spatial variation in rock and soil types often reflects a higher level of plant diversity (Elvidge and Lyon, 1985). This is particularly the case in the mountains of Saudi Arabia (Abulfatih, 1983). Thus, the plant community structure of the mountain environment is highly affected by topoclimatic complexity (Oldfather et al., 2016). The mountains of the Arabian Peninsula have great ecological significance for plant diversity due to the abundance of endemic and endangered species (Hall et al., 2009 Thomas et al., 2017, Al-Namazi et al., 2021). Jandaf Mountain within the Asir region has steep slopes and the surrounding valleys provide a biogeographic and bioclimatic refuge area for plant species. The vegetation of Jandaf Mountain is influenced by heterogeneity in elevation, hydrology, and moisture from the air current coming from the Red Sea. The mountain contains several habitats with distinct plant community structures due to the variation in local climate and conditions. These attributes highlight the ecological importance of Jandaf Mountain to plant diversity.

Several surveys have been conducted in the Asir mountainous region (e.g. Abulfatih, 1983, Hosni and Hegazy, 1996, Heneidy and Bidak, 2001, Al-Yemeni and Sher, 2010, Seraj et al., 2014, Ghazal, 2015). Although Wadi Tarj and the surrounding mountains (e.g. Jandaf Mountain) are already known to be habitats for endangered animal species such as the Arabian Gazelle (Gazella arabica, Boug et al., 2012), endemic and endangered plant species are likely to inhabit these mountains. However, no survey has yet been conducted on the vegetation of Jandaf Mountain.

We assess the eligibility of Jandaf Mountain for consideration as an important conservation area by applying the criteria of the Important Plant Area (IPA) based on the results of our survey (Plantlife International, 2002). Moreover, this study aims to make a checklist for all recorded plant species to contribute to the flora of Saudi Arabia, and highlights the importance of conserving Jandaf Mountain due to its unique botanical diversity.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study site

Jandaf Mountain is an isolated mountain surrounded by Tarj valley streams. It is located about 60 km west of Bisha city with the highest elevation at around 1900 m above sea level (a.s.l.) (located at 19°33′N, 42°20′E). The elevation ranges from 1400 m a.s.l. near the Tarj valley to 1910 m a.s.l. at the summit. The mountain extends for a distance of 13 km on the east-west axis and 7 km in the north–south axis (Fig. 1). Jandaf Mountain has an arid climate with an annual precipitation of 126 mm. The monthly average of the maximum temperature is 38 °C, while the monthly average of the minimum temperature is about 9 °C, and the average annual of mean temperature is about 25 °C (National Center for Meteorology (NCM, 2021), see Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Topographic map of the study site at Jandaf Mountain, Saudi Arabia. Elevation of the study area at Jandaf Mountain (indicated by white frame) ranges from 1400 to 1900 m a.s.l.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Climate graph showing the monthly mean monthly maximum, average, and minimum temperatures (°C) and rainfall (mm) near the study site (Bishah weather station for the period from 2003 to 2017).

Jandaf Mountain is a part of the Arabian shield which is made up of rocks of the Bisha complex, which consist of volcanic and plutonic rocks. Biotite Monzogranite covers the upper parts of the mountains. They are pale reddish gray to light-gray and medium coarse-grained. Tonalite and Diorite occur in the lower areas, which are metamorphic rocks and forms part of the Jeddah group (Ministry of Petroleum and Minerals, 1985). Jandaf Mountain descends steeply in three directions: north, east, and west. However, many gullies formed by water erosion (i.e., by ephemeral streams) hold significant vegetation cover (Fig. 1).

2.2. Field survey

The inventory study was conducted at the end of March 2018 across a 30 km2 area. Two transects were laid out along the slopes of Jandaf Mountain. The first transect was placed on the west facing side of the mountain, while the second transect was on the east facing side. Ten (50 × 50 m2) quadrats were laid out along each transect. In each quadrat, we recorded the density and frequency of each plant species. In addition, for each quadrat we recorded the location information such as latitude, longitude, and altitude.

2.3. Conservation criteria

Areas with high biodiversity and conservation value (i.e., high conservation value areas - HCVAs) have high species richness, with rare or endemic species. The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) originally developed the High Conservation Value (HCV) approach in 1999 for use in forest management certification to identify areas eligible for conservation (Anderson, 2002, Jennings et al., 2003, Judd et al., 2007, Brown et al., 2013). In addition, Plantlife International, which is a non-profit charity based in the UK, established the IPA program to meet the urgent need for the reduction of global plant diversity issues (Al-Abbasi et al., 2010). The approach of IPA was compatible with the regional inventories and plant diversity of European countries (Eken et al., 2004), and does not fit with other specific regions around the world (e.g., arid areas) due to some limitations in term of data availability (e.g. vegetation data, population size, and threats), that have been discussed by Knight et al. (2007) or technical limitations (global, regional, and local limitations) of conservation assessments according to Darbyshire et al. (2017). Therefore, the approach of IPA was adapted by Al-Abbasi et al. (2010) to be used for countries in the Arabian Peninsula (e.g., Saudi Arabia). We applied the criteria for High Conservation Value Areas (HCVA) and Important Plant Areas (IPA) using our survey data. Areas with values which are considered very significant at the national, regional, or global level can be significantly or critically important due to their high biological, ecological, social, or cultural values. These are defined to the following criteria (i.e., HCV(1) to HCV(6) for HCVA, and B-A to B-C for IPA). The specific criteria are presented in supplementary 1 and 2.

3. Results

Upon this survey, within all plotted quadrats, 118 plant species were recorded in Jandaf Mountain. The recorded plant species belong to about 97 genera and 42 plant families. Most of the Jandaf plant species were perennials (i.e., trees, shrubs, and iteroparous herbs) (Table 1). Although the plant cover was remarkably low across Jandaf Mountain, the plant density and species richness were high and valuable.

Table 1.

Full list of plant species recorded in the study area with information on their families, life forms, density, and frequency. The life forms are represented by Ch: chamaephytes, G: geophytes, Ph: phanerophytes, and Th: therophytes. The conservation status of each species is represented by DD: Data Deficient species, LC: Least Concern, NE: Not Evaluated, EN: Endangered, NT: Near Threatened. The habitats of each species are represented by UPPER: upper plain, LOWER: lower plain, and VALLEY: Wadi Tarj.* indicates to the endemic species.

Family Species Growth form Life form Density/ha Frequency Status Habitat
Acanthaceae Barleria bispinosa (Forssk.) shrub Ch 4 0.6 DD UPPER
Barleria trispinosa (Forssk.) Brumm. & Wood shrub Ch 2 0.2 DD UPPER
Blepharis ciliaris (L.) B.l.Burtt herb Ch 2.4 0.4 LC COMMON
Aizoaceae Aizoon canariense L. herb Th 6 0.1 DD LOWER
Zaleya pentandra (L.) C. Jeffrey herb Th 2 0.3 DD LOWER
Amaranthaceae Aerva javanica (Burm. f.) Juss. ex Schult. herb Ch 2.8 0.4 LC VALLEY
Aerva lanata (L.) A. l. Juss. ex Schultes. herb Ch 2 0.1 LC LOWER
Alternanthera pungens Kunth. herb Ch 2.6 0.2 NA LOWER
Amaranthus hybridus L. herb Th 6.8 0.2 DD VALLEY
Salsola cyclophylla Baker. shrub Ch 2.1 0.3 NA LOWER
Celosia polystachya (Forssk.) C.C.Towns. undershrub Ch 2 0.1 NA VALLEY
Pupalia lappacea (L.) Juss herb Ch 4 0.4 LC LOWER
Anacardiaceae Pistacia falcata Becc. ex Martelli tree Ph 1.2 0.2 NA UPPER
Searsia retinorrhoea (=Rhus retinorrhoea) tree Ph 12 0.3 NA UPPER
Apocynaceae Adenium obesum (Forssk.) Roem. & Schult. shrub Ph 2.7 0.3 LC UPPER
Calotropis procera (Aiton) W.T.Aiton shrub Ph 11 0.2 LC VALLEY
Asclepiadaceae Monolluma quadrangula (Forssk.) Plowes * Succulent herb Th 0.3 0.05 NA UPPER
Desmidorchis retrospiciens (N.E.Br.) Ehrenb. Succulent herb Ch 0.8 0.2 NA LOWER
Gomphocarpus sinaicus Boiss. undershrub Ch 3.1 0.3 NA LOWER
Kanahia laniflora (Forssk.) R.Br. herb Th 2 0.2 LC VALLEY
Pergularia daemia (Forssk.) Chiov. vine Ch 6.1 0.3 LC LOWER
Leptadenia pyrotechnica (Forssk.) Decne. shrub Ph 3.6 0.5 LC VALLEY
Asparagaceae Aloe pseudorubroviolacea Lavranos & Collen. * Succulent herb Ch 0.4 0.1 NA UPPER
Dracaena serrulata Baker * shrub Ph 2 0.05 EN UPPER
Asphodelaceae Asphodelus aestivus Brot. herb Th 15 0.5 LC LOWER
Asteraceae Conyza pyrrhopappa Sch.- Bip. ex A. Rich. undershrub Ch 6 0.1 NA VALLEY
Centaurea schimperi DC. herb Ch 4.1 0.3 NA LOWER
Centaurea sinaica DC. herb Ch 4.6 0.4 NA LOWER
Crepis rueppellii Sch.-Bip. herb Ch 2 0.3 NA VALLEY
Ambrosia maritima L. herb Th 3.2 0.3 LC VALLEY
Echinops hystrichoides Kit-Tan herb Ch 3.6 0.2 NA LOWER
Heteroderis pusilla (Boiss.) Boiss. herb Th 1.6 0.2 NA LOWER
Launaea massauensis (Fresen.) Sch. Bip. herb Th 0.8 0.1 NA VALLEY
Onopordum heteracanthum C.A. May herb Ch 0.9 0.3 NA LOWER
Pluchea dioscoridis (L.) DC. undershrub Ch 2 0.2 LC VALLEY
Pulicaria glutinosa (Boiss.) Jaub. & Spach herb Ch 3.6 0.4 NA LOWER
Pulicaria undulata (L.) C.A. May herb Ch 3.6 0.3 NA LOWER
Pulicaria vulgaris Gaertn. herb Ch 1 0.1 LC LOWER
Boraginaceae Arnebia hispidissima (Lehm.) DC. herb Th 4.7 0.3 NA LOWER
Asperugo procumbens L. herb Th 0.4 0.1 NA UPPER
Echium longifolium Delile. herb Th 6 0.15 NA UPPER
Heliotropium aegyptiacum (Lehm.) DC. herb Th 6.2 0.4 NA VALLEY
Heliotropium arbainense Fresen. herb Th 1.2 0.2 NA LOWER
Burseraceae Commiphora gileadensis C. Christ. tree Ph 44.4 0.2 NA COMMON
Commiphora kataf Engl. tree Ph 4 0.15 NA LOWER
Capparaceae Capparis cartilaginea Decaisne tree Ph 1.1 0.1 LC LOWER
Maerua crassifolia Forssk. tree Ph 0.4 0.1 LC LOWER
Maerua oblongifolia (Forssk.) A.Rich. shrub Ch 0.1 0.1 NA LOWER
Celastraceae Maytenus arbutifolia (Hochst. ex A.Rich.) R.Wilczek shrub Ph 2 0.3 LC UPPER
Combretaceae Combretum molle R.Br. ex G. Don tree Ph 1.2 0.1 LC UPPER
Convolvulaceae Seddera arabica (Forssk.) Choisy herb Ch 0.8 0.1 NA LOWER
Cucurbitaceae Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrader vine Ch 1.9 0.2 NA VALLEY
Zehneria scabra (L.f.) Sond. vine Ch 1 0.2 NA UPPER
Corallocarpus epigaeus (Rottler) Hook.f. vine Ch 0.9 0.3 NA UPPER
Cyperaceae Carex divisa Huds herb Th 1.2 0.1 LC LOWER
Ebenaceae Euclea schimperi (A. DC.) Dandy tree Ph 0.4 0.05 LC UPPER
Ephedraceae Ephedra foeminea Forssk. shrub Ph 4.4 0.2 LC LOWER
Ephedra foliata Boiss. ex C.A. May shrub Ch 1.2 0.1 LC UPPER
Euphorbiaceae Euphorbia cuneata Vahl shrub Ch 2.4 0.2 LC LOWER
Ricinus communis L. shrub Ch 2 0.2 NA VALLEY
Geraniaceae Erodium cicutarium (L.) L'Her herb Th 1 0.15 NA UPPER
Erodium neuradifolium Del. herb Th 1.4 0.15 NA UPPER
Fabaceae Acacia asak (Forssk.) Willd. tree Ph 14.4 0.4 NA COMMON
Acacia gerrardii Benth. tree Ph 3 0.15 NA LOWER
Acacia ehrenbergiana Hayne tree Ph 8 0.15 LC VALLEY
Acacia tortilis (Forssk.) Hayne tree Ph 4.4 0.15 LC VALLEY
Acacia hamulosa Benth. tree Ph 1 0.1 LC LOWER
Astragalus spinosus (Forssk.) Muschl. herb Th 0.1 0.05 NA VALLEY
Indigofera articulata Gouan undershrub Ch 7.2 0.25 NA COMMON
Indigofera coerulea Roxb. undershrub Ch 0.9 0.15 LC COMMON
Indigofera spinosa Forssk. undershrub Ch 5.6 0.35 NA COMMON
Medicago minima (L.) L. herb Th 2.7 0.4 LC COMMON
Trigonella anguina Del. herb Th 3 0.4 NA COMMON
Geraniaceae Grewia tembensis Fresen shrub / tree Ph 3.2 0.5 NA UPPER
Grewia tenax (Forssk.) Fiori shrub / tree Ph 4 0.5 LC UPPER
Juncaceae Juncus punctorius L.f. herb Th 0.3 0.05 LC VALLEY
Lamiaceae Mentha longifolia ssp. schimperi (Briq.) Briq. herb Th 4.4 0.05 LC VALLEY
Lavandula pubescens Decne. herb Ch 1.2 0.3 NA UPPER
Marrubium vulgare L. herb Ch 2.2 0.2 NT LOWER
Ocimum forsskaolii Benth. herb Ch 0.1 0.05 NA LOWER
Otostegia fruticosa ssp. schimperi (Benth.) Sebald herb Ch 4.8 0.4 NA UPPER
Salvia merjamie Forssk. herb Ch 0.1 0.1 NA UPPER
Malvaceae Abutilon bidentatum A. Rich. shrub Ch 15.6 0.5 NA VALLEY
Hibiscus deflersii Schweinf. ex Cufod. undershrub Ch 0.8 0.05 NA LOWER
Hibiscus micranthus L. undershrub Th 6.4 0.25 NA LOWER
Hibiscus vitifolius L. undershrub Ch 1.6 0.2 NA LOWER
Menispermaceae Cocculus pendulus (J.R. & G. Forster) Diels vine Ph 0.4 0.05 NA LOWER
Moraceae Ficus cordata ssp. salicifolia (Vahl) C.C. Berg. tree Ph 2.4 0.4 LC LOWER
Ficus palmata Forssk. tree Ph 0.7 0.2 NA UPPER
Moringaceae Moringa peregrina (Forssk.) Fiori * tree Ph 0.8 0.05 NT LOWER
Oleaceae Olea europaea subsp. cuspidata (Wall. ex G. Don) Cif. tree Ph 1.2 0.3 NA UPPER
Papaveraceae Argemone mexicana L. herb Th 4.8 0.1 LC VALLEY
Plantaginaceae Plantago boissieri Hausskn. & Bornm. herb Th 17 0.35 NA UPPER
Poaceae Panicum turgidum Forssk. grass G 0.8 0.1 NA LOWER
Andropogon distachyos L. grass Th 6 0.5 NA LOWER
Aristida adscensionis L. grass Th 4 0.3 NA UPPER
Aristida congesta Roem. & Schults grass Th 3 0.25 NA UPPER
Aristida tricornis H. Scholz & Konig grass Th 3.5 0.3 NA UPPER
Avena barbata Pott ex Link grass Th 6 0.3 NA VALLEY
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. grass G 3 0.2 LC LOWER
Eragrostis aspera (Jacq.) Nees grass Th 1.6 0.3 NA UPPER
Stipagrostis hirtigluma (Trin. Rupr.) de Wint. grass Th 4.8 0.4 NA LOWER
Themeda triandra Forssk. grass Th 5.6 0.6 NA UPPER
Tripogon purpurascens Duthie grass G 0.9 0.1 NA VALLEY
Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. & Steudel. grass Th 0.5 0.05 LC VALLEY
Resedaceae Ochradenus baccatus Del. shrub Ph 5.6 0.6 LC UPPER
Reseda sphenocleoides Defl. herb Th 1.2 0.3 NA VALLEY
Rhamnaceae Ziziphus spina-christi (L.) Desf. tree Ph 4.8 0.3 LC VALLEY
Salicaceae Salix mucronata Thunb. tree Ph 1.2 0.05 NA VALLEY
Salvadoraceae Salvadora persica L. tree Ph 2.8 0.3 LC LOWER
Sapindaceae Dodonaea viscosa L. shrub Ph 0.8 0.1 LC UPPER
Solanaceae Lycium shawii Roem. & Schult. shrub Ph 11.2 0.7 LC LOWER
Datura innoxia Mill. herb Ch 21 0.3 NA LOWER
Nicotiana glauca R.C. Graham undershrub Ph 6.4 0.15 LC VALLEY
Solanum incanum L. undershrub Ch 31 0.7 LC COMMON
Stilbaceae Nuxia oppositifolia (Hochst.) Benth. tree Ph 0.4 0.05 LC LOWWER
Tamaricaceae Tamarix aphylla (L.) Karst. tree Ph 1.2 0.1 LC VALLEY
Zygophyllaceae Fagonia indica Burm.f. herb Th 6 0.7 NA COMMON
Open in a new tab

We applied the criteria of the Important Plant Areas (IPA, Plantlife International, 2004) to our survey results. We found that the vegetation diversity of Jandaf Mountain contains several endemic and near endemic plant taxa. For example, Aloe pseudorubroviolacea is a national endemic, Monolluma quadrangula is regionally endemic, and Dracaena serrulata and Combretum molle are regionally range-restricted taxa. Thus, the vegetation composition of Jandaf Mountain meets several of the criteria of IPA and HCVA (e.g. criterion A of the IPA criteria and HCV1 of HVCA criteria; see supplementary 1 and 2).

Furthermore, the study site has an exceptionally rich flora in a regional context in relation to its biogeographic zone. Thus, the small area of Jandaf Mountain has a high species richness within an arid environment (i.e., 118 species within a small arid area of Jandaf Mountain). This satisfies the criterion of IPA criteria (see supplementary 1). Moreover, the isolation and the steep slopes of Jandaf Mountain make it a refuge for a number of threatened and endangered species (e.g. Aloe pseudorubroviolacea, Monolluma quadrangula, Dracaena serrulata, and Combretum molle) which meet the criterion HVC3 of HVCA criteria (see supplementary 2).

Across the study area, the plant community structure varies depending on elevation. The elevation in the study site ranges from 1400 m in the valleys around Jandaf Mountain to about 1900 m at the mountain summit (Fig. 1). This variation is reflected in the vegetation type and plant diversity. Therefore, we classified the vegetation into several ecological zones depending on the elevation.

3.1. Wadi Tarj habitat

The valley habitat (e.g., Wadi Tarj) around Jandaf Mountain was located at elevations between 1400 and 1450 m a.s.l. This habitat has a high species richness and was dominated by Ziziphus spina-christi, Acacia ehrenberrigiana, Leptadenia pyrotechnica, Abutilon bidentatum, Conyza pyrrhopappa, and Aerva javanica. A few individuals of rare species such as Moringa peregrina and Salix mucronata have been recorded only in this habitat, these two species occur only in one quadrat with frequency of 0.05 for each species.

3.2. Lower plain

The plots surveyed in this habitat lies between 1450 and 1500 m a.s.l.; such plots at this altitude have the highest species richness (Fig. 3). The most dominant species in this habitat are Commiphora gileadensis, Abutilon bidentatum, Rhus retinorrhoe, Commiphora kataf. and Salvadora persica. Several rare species have been found restricted in this habitat such as Hibiscus deflersii and Nuxia oppositifolia with low frequency about 0.05 for both species.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

The mean Species Richness ± (SE) in the three different elevation layers (N = 10, df = 9, F = 5.26, P = 0.40).

3.3. Upper plain

The elevations of this part of Jandaf Mountain were above 1500 m a.s.l. This area was largely inaccessible due to the height and the steep slopes. These factors contribute to reserve some endangered species such as Dracaena serrulata and Aloe pseudorubroviolacea which are endemic to the Arabian Peninsula. The most common species in this habitat are Commiphora gileadensis, Otostegia fruticosa, and Rhus retinorrhoe. The survey show that this part contained several rare species, which have a low frequency across the study area such as Dracaena serrulata, Euclea schimperi, and Seddera arabica with frequency 0.05, 0.05, and 0.1 respectively. These species are considered regional endemic (i.e. endemic to east Afromontane region and south west of Arabian Peninsula) and considered globally rare. Such species have been found the rarest species in this habitat.

4. Discussion

The result of the field survey illustrated that Jandaf Mountain is high in species diversity. The highest species richness nearest to Jandaf occurs in Asir (Bisha region), which has 140 species (Heneidy and Bidak, 2001). We recorded about 118 species (Table 1) within a small elevated area (30 km2), compared to 140 species in Bisha and its vicinity, which is across a much larger area (about 250,600 km2, e.g., Heneidy and Bidak, 2001). The variation in altitude at the small mountainous area is the main reason behind the high species richness of Jandaf Mountain (Al-Namazi et al., 2021).

The west side of Assarwat Mountains is usually more diverse than the east side due to the waves of fog that hit the west side (Al-Robai et al., 2019, Al-Namazi et al., 2021). Although Jandaf Mountain is an isolated mountain located to the east of the Assarwat Mountains and is affected by the harsh desert climate inland, it has relatively high plant diversity. Thus, the vegetation structure of Jandaf Mountain is dominated by the common species that grow in the Assrawat Mountains in addition to some species that often grow in the desert environment of Saudi Arabia such as Acacia gerrardii, A. ehrenbergiana, A. tortilis, Calotropis procera, Maerua crassifolia, Ochradenus baccatus, Panicum turgidum, and Pulicaria undulata. This also contributed to the enhanced species richness at this mountain.

Although there are many of common species that grow across a wide range of locations in the mountain, some species were found restricted to a specific elevation (see Table 1). Most of the rare and endangered species in the study area (e.g., D. serrulata, A. pseudorubroviolacea, and M. quadrangula) were restricted only to the highest elevation at Jandaf Mountain. Some other rare species such as C. molle, and M. peregrina were found only on the lower plain habitat. In contrast, the valley of Wadi Tarj is characterised by some species such as S. mucronata, Z. spina-christi, P. australis, A. spinosus, Juncus punctorius, and other species that could not be found growing anywhere else. The high level of specialisation contributes to the remarkable plant diversity.

The high plant biodiversity on this mountain qualifies for designation as an IPA. The first criterion (Criterion A) of the IPA (Al-Abbasi et al., 2010 see supplementary 1) is satisfied by the presence of several endemic and near-endemic plant species at Jandaf Mountain, such as A. pseudorubroviolacea, M. quadrangula, D. serrulata, C. molle, and M. peregrina. Furthermore, the species richness at this mountain satisfies Criterion B of the IPA. Satisfying these two criteria qualifies Janduf Mountain as an important plant area of the Arabian Peninsula. Our results also show that the vegetation of Jandaf Mountain satisfies several criteria of the HCVAs. The high species richness in Jandaf Mountain and the presence of some endemic and near-endemic species satisfies HCA1 and HCA3 (HCVA) see (supplementary 2). Satisfying these two criteria is sufficient support for the uniqueness of the vegetation type of this region.

About 20% of plant species across the world have been found to be threatened with extinction (Brummitt et al., 2015, Bachman et al., 2016). Thus, areas holding important plant diversity need urgent conservation effort (Darbyshire et al., 2017). Similarly, the unique vegetation of Jandaf is currently threatened by different factors, such as climate change (particularly drought), competition with other associated species, and most importantly human activities (such as overgrazing and clearing). Dracaena serrulata, for instance, was found to be very rare in Jandaf Mountain and is represented by only three individuals located in very remote inaccessible spots (i.e., it is restricted to the summit of upper plain). The main reason accounting for the rarity of D. serrulata is over-cutting by the beekeepers for use as beehives for the production of honey. Therefore, the vegetation of Jandaf Mountain needs to be reserved to protect the habitats of endemic and endangered species inhabiting the mountain. Along with the Wadi Tarj, both areas are proposed to be protected as a Strict Nature Reserves (Category Ia) under the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN; see Boug et al., 2012, Brummitt et al., 2015).

Different conservation methods should be conducted on the vegetation of the mountain of Jandaf based on the nature of species and habitat. For example, species that suffer overgrazing should be protected from grazing in order to re-establish populations (Al-Rowaily et al., 2015). Other species need to be propagated at botanical gardens or nurseries and then transplanted to the site for regeneration (Werden et al., 2018). In contrast, some species may not need any conservation efforts. For example, species that cannot be reached by herbivore animals or disturbance due to high elevation and inaccessibility of their habitat's topography are likely under less threat. In another example, the species that have defence mechanisms (e.g., chemical or physical defence) can escape the impact of herbivories and may be less impacted (Hanley and Lamont, 2002, Hanley et al., 2007, Agrawal and Konno, 2009), so they require less conservation effort than more vulnerable species.

Overall, our study found exceptional plant diversity at Jandaf Mountain, which suggests its designation as an important area for conservation would be crucial to the maintenance of biodiversity in the Arabian Peninsula. Future directions include studies on the gene flow and intraspecific differences among populations of the rare and vulnerable plant species.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology for supporting this research. Justin S.H. Wan was supported by the Jiangsu University Research Foundation Fund (20JDG056).

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.03.003.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.docx (13.1KB, docx)

References

  1. Abulfatih, H.A., 1983. Elevationally restricted floral element of the Asir mountains, Saudi Arabia, Journal of Arid Environments 7, 35-41.
  2. Agrawal A.A., Konno K. Latex: a model for understanding mechanisms, ecology, and evolution of plant defense against herbivory. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009;40:311–331. [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Abbasi T.M., Al-Farhan A., Al-Khulaidi A.W., Hall M., Llewellyn O.A., Miller A.G., Patzelt A. Important plant areas in the Arabian Peninsula. Edinburgh J. Botany. 2010;67:25–35. [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Namazi A.A., Al-Khulaidi A.W.A., Algarni S., Al-Sagheer N.A. Natural plant species inventory of hotspot areas in Arabian Peninsula: Southwest Al-Baha region, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021;28:3309–3324. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Al-Robai S.A., Mohamed H.A., Ahmed A.A., Al-Khulaidi A.W.A. Effects of elevation gradients and soil components on the vegetation density and species diversity of Alabna escarpment, southwestern Saudi Arabia. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2019;39(3):202–211. [Google Scholar]
  6. Al-Rowaily S.L., El-Bana M.I., Al-Bakre D.A., Assaeed A.M., Hegazy A.K., Ali M.B. Effects of open grazing and livestock exclusion on floristic composition and diversity in natural ecosystem of Western Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2015;22:430–437. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Al-Yemeni M., Sher H. Biological spectrum with some other ecological attributes of the flora and vegetation of the Asir Mountain of South West, Saudi Arabia. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010;9:5550–5559. [Google Scholar]
  8. Anderson, S., 2002. Identifying Important Plant Areas. Plantlife International.
  9. Bachman, S., Fernandez, E.P., HARGREAVES, S., Nic Lughadha, E., Rivers, M., Williams, E., 2016. Extinction risk and threats to plants. In: RBG Kew, state of the world’s plants report. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, p 58–63
  10. Boug A., Islam M.Z.U., Shehry A.A., Wronski T. Camera trapping confirms the persistence of Arabian Gazelles, Gazella arabica, in the Asir Mountains, Saudi Arabia: (Mammalia: Bovidae) Zoology in the Middle East. 2012;57:3–10. [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown E., Dudley N., Lindhe A., Muhtaman D.R., Stewart C., Synnott T. Common guidance for the identification of High Conservation Values. HCV ResourceNetwork. 2013 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brummitt N.A., Bachman S.P., Griffiths-Lee J., Lutz M., Moat J.F., Farjon A., Donaldson J.S., Hilton-Taylor C., Meagher T.R., Albuquerque S., Aletrari E. Green plants in the red: A baseline global assessment for the IUCN sampled Red List Index for plants. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0135152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Collenette, S., 1999. Wildflowers of Saudi Arabia. National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development (NCWCD), Riyadh- Saudi Arabia.
  14. Darbyshire I., Anderson S., Asatryan A., Byfield A., Cheek M., Clubbe C., Radford E.A. Important Plant Areas: revised selection criteria for a global approach to plant conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 2017;26:1767–1800. [Google Scholar]
  15. Eken G., Bennun L., Brooks T.M., Darwall W., Fishpool L.D., Foster M., Knox D., Langhammer P., Matiku P., Radford E., Salaman P. Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. Bioscience. 2004;54:1110–1118. [Google Scholar]
  16. Elvidge C.D., Lyon R.J.P. Influence of rock-soil spectral variation on the assessment of green biomass. Remote Sens. Environ. 1985;17(3):265–279. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ghazal, A.M.F., 2015 Vegetation patterns and plant communities distribution along an altitudinal gradient at Asir Mountain, southwest Saudi Arabia. Pakistan Journal of Botany 47: 1377-1389.
  18. Hall M., Scholte P., Al-Khulaidi A.W., Miller A.G., Al-Qadasi A.H., Al-Farhan A., Al-Abbasi T.M. Arabia's last forests under threat II: remaining fragments of unique valley forest in southwest Arabia. Edinburgh J. Botany. 2009;66:263–281. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hanley M.E., Lamont B.B. Relationships between physical and chemical attributes of congeneric seedlings: how important is seedling defence? Funct. Ecol. 2002;16:216–222. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hanley M.E., Lamont B.B., Fairbanks M.M., Rafferty C.M. Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defence. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2007;8:157–178. [Google Scholar]
  21. Heneidy S.Z., Bidak L.M. Biodiversity of the plant species in Bisha, Asir region, southwestern Saudi Arabia. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2001;4:1323–1330. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hosni H.A., Hegazy A.K. Contribution to the flora of Asir, Saudi Arabia. Candollea. 1996;51:169–202. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jennings, S., Nussbaum, R., Judd, N., Evans, T., Iacobelli, T., Jarvie, J., Lindhe, A., Synnott, T., Vallejos, C., Yaroshenko, A., Chunquan, Z.¸2003. The high conservation value forest toolkit Edition I, ProForest, Oxford 12, 1-62.
  24. Judd N., Nussbaum R., Jennings S., Evans T. Proforest; Oxford, UK: 2007. HCVF toolkit part 1. Introduction to HCVF. [Google Scholar]
  25. Knight A.T., Smith R.J., Cowling R.M., Desmet P.G., Faith D.P., Ferrier S., Gelderblom C.M., Grantham H., Lombard A.T., Maze K., Nel J.L. Improving the key biodiversity areas approach for effective conservation planning. Bioscience. 2007;57:256–261. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kollmair M., Gurung G.S., Hurni K., Maselli D. Mountains: Special places to be protected? An analysis of worldwide nature conservation efforts in mountains. Int. J. Biodiversity Sci. Manage. 2005;1(4):181–189. [Google Scholar]
  27. NCM . National Center for Meteorology; Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: 2021. Excel file for unpublished data. [Google Scholar]
  28. Noroozi J., Talebi A., Doostmohammadi M., Rumpf S.B., Linder H.P., Schneeweiss G.M. Hotspots within a global biodiversity hotspot-areas of endemism are associated with high mountain ranges. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28504-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Oldfather M.F., Britton M.N., Papper P.D., Koontz M.J., Halbur M.M., Dodge C., Flint A.L., Flint L.E., Ackerly D.D. Effects of topoclimatic complexity on the composition of woody plant communities. AoB Plants. 2016;8:plw049. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plw049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Plantlife International, 2004. Identifying and protecting the world’s most Important Plant Areas. Plantlife International, Salisbury. www.plantlife.org.uk/publications/identifying_and_protecting_the_worlds_most_important_plant_areas.
  31. Seraj S.S., Jrais R.N., Ayyad S.K. Floristic composition, life form and chorology of plant life at Al-Saoda, Asir Region, South-Western Saudi Arabia. J. Biol., Agric. Healthcare. 2014;4:60–65. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sherman R., Mullen R., Li H., Fang Z., Wang Y. Alpine ecosystems of northwest Yunnan, China: an initial assessment for conservation. J. Mountain Sci. 2007;4:181–192. [Google Scholar]
  33. Thomas J., El-Sheikh M.A., Alatar A.A. Endemics and endangered species in the biodiversity hotspot of the Shada Mountains, Saudi Arabia. J. Arid Land. 2017;9:109–121. [Google Scholar]
  34. Werden L.K., Alvarado J.P., Zarges S., CALDERÓN M.E., Schilling E.M., GUTIÉRREZ L.M., Powers J.S. Using soil amendments and plant functional traits to select native tropical dry forest species for the restoration of degraded Vertisols. J. Appl. Ecol. 2018;55:1019–1028. [Google Scholar]

Further Reading

  1. Abuzinada, A.H., Al-Wetaid, Y.I. & Al-Basyouni, S.Z.M., 2005. The National Strategy for Conservation of Biodiversity in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Prepared and issued by: The National Commission for Wildlife Conservation and Development. Conservation of Biological Diversity, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.docx (13.1KB, docx)

Articles from Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES