Table 1.
Normalisation Process Theory (NPT)—constructs, components and definitions (based on the NPT Online Toolkit at www.normalizationprocess.org)
| Constructs | Components | Definition | 
| Coherence—the sense-making work | Differentiation | Whether the intervention is easy to describe to service providers and whether healthcare professionals can appreciate how it differs or is clearly distinct from current ways of working. | 
| Communal specification | Whether healthcare professionals have or are able to build a shared understanding of the aims, objectives, and expected outcomes of the proposed intervention. | |
| Individual specification | Whether individual staff have or are able to make sense of the work—specific tasks and responsibilities the proposed intervention would create for them. | |
| Internalisation | Whether healthcare professionals have or are able to easily grasp the potential value, benefits and importance of the intervention. | |
| Cognitive participation—the relational work | Initiation | Whether or not key healthcare professionals are able and willing to get others involved in the new practice. | 
| Enrolment | The capacity and willingness of healthcare professionals to organise themselves in order to collectively contribute to the work involved in the new practice. | |
| Legitimation | Whether or not healthcare professionals believe it is right for them to be involved, and that they can make a contribution to the implementation work. | |
| Activation | The capacity and willingness of healthcare professionals to collectively define the actions and procedures needed to keep the new practice going. | |
| Collective action—the operational work | Interactional workability | Whether healthcare professionals are able to enact the intervention and operationalise its components in practice. | 
| Relational integration | Whether healthcare professionals maintain trust in the intervention and in each other. | |
| Skill set workability | Whether the work required by the intervention is appropriately allocated to healthcare professionals with the right mix of skills and training to do it. | |
| Contextual integration | Whether the intervention is supported by the host organisation, management and other stakeholders, protocols, policies and procedures. | |
| Reflexive monitoring—the appraisal work | Systematisation | Whether healthcare professionals can determine how effective and useful the intervention is from the use of formal and/or informal evaluation methods. | 
| Communal appraisal | Whether, as a result of formal monitoring, healthcare professionals collectively agree about the worth of the effects of the intervention. | |
| Individual appraisal | Whether individuals involved with (healthcare professionals), or affected by (patients), the intervention, think it is worthwhile. | |
| Reconfiguration | Whether healthcare professionals or services using the intervention can make changes as a result of individual and communal appraisal. |