Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 29;29(5):3232–3243. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.051

Table 2.

Morphological and physical parameters studied after inoculation by injecting bacterial suspension.

Treatments SFW (g) RFW (g) SDW (g) RDW (g) SL (cm) RL (cm) RLWC (%)
Un-inoculated Control 1.38ef 0.64h 0.63g 0.43h 33.33cd 14cd 64.64a
Bacillus safensis 2.75b 1.18d 0.96e 0.64c 43.33a 16.3c 29.032b
Pseudomonas sp. 3.62a 1.36a 1.93b 0.75b 40b 17.13bc 77.407b
Enterococcus faecalis 3.15b 1.205c 1.633c 0.76b 31de 19.083a 11.46b
Bacillus megaterium 2.043cd 1.195e 1.53c 0.78b 34.66cd 18.25ab 56.53b
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1.19e 0.66h 0.583g 0.32e 36.83c 14.333d 25.37h
Brevibacillus borstelensis 1.61e 0.64f 1.013de 0.446d 23.41g 12.41ef 17.39b
Staphylococcus haemolyticus 0.89f 0.54i 0.606g 0.45d 28.58f 9.5g 12.655b
Enterobacter hormaechei 0.74f 0.54j 0.363h 0.308e 19.16h 16.41c 47.97b
Bacillus cereus 2.033d 0.96e 1.127d 3.141c 31.41g 12.166f 86.792b
Proteus mirabilis 1.116f 0.556h 0.755f 0.421d 16.75h 12.916d-f 22.365b
Fisher’s LSD 8.418 6.244 0.1243 7.45 2.722 1.639 18.92

The results are the average of three replicates (n = three). Values in the same column accompanied by lower-case letters do not differ significantly (P <0.05) as per Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) method.