Table 4.
Recommendation | Checklist ✓ Changes made × Changes not made | Reason | |
---|---|---|---|
Add | Add room for other factors that may influence decision, e.g. social factors (STH10) | × | Not specified enough, covered some social aspects already |
P.34 add “yes no maybe” (STH10) | × | No, but we did change the response | |
Change | What to do if patients disagree with doctors’ recommendations (LTH8) | × | Unethical, decision-aid is supposed to be neutral |
Consent form examples, emphasise quantity (LTH8) | × | Can differ between hospitals, leading? | |
Surrogacy versus carrying own baby (LTH8) | × | Not within remit | |
What happens at the clinic (LTH9) | × | Felt a lot of information already, but we did update the text (e.g. changes from fertility expert to fertility care team) | |
Signpost HEFA website (LTH9) | × | Already done | |
Case studies, possible side effects (STH10) | × | Would bias the decision aid, we do mention side-effects | |
How relatives can support decision maker | × | Already included | |
Possibility of fostering, does having had cancer affect chances? (SU3) | × | Felt inappropriate | |
Adoption issues after CT (SU3) | × | Felt inappropriate | |
Add POSITIVE cancer trial results (SU4) | × | ||
P12, graph: add shaded area (STH10) | ✓ | ||
Move p. 35 to the end (SU4) | ✓ | ||
Omit | Can be challenging numbering 1-4 (STH9) | × | |
Page 10, cut where it says “use space” as the women could bring a notebook (STH10) | ✓ |