Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;12:905846. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.905846

Table 2.

Meta-analysis of high CD68+ TAMs density and clinicopathological features of breast cancer patients.

Clinicopathological features  References No. of studies Model Pooled OR (95% CI) P value Heterogeneity
I2 (%) P value
Tumor nest
Age
(< 50 y vs ≥ 50 y)
≥ 50 years 9 Random 0.59 (0.33-1.04) 0.07 93 < 0.001
Tumor size
(< 2cm vs ≥ 2cm)
≥ 2cm 9 Random 0.36 (0.15-0.85) 0.02 96 < 0.001
Lymph node status
(N0 vs. N1-3)
N1-3 7 Random 0.74 (0.13-1.29) 0.28 90 < 0.001
Histological grade
(І, II vs III)
III 13 Random 0.85 (0.46-1.56) 0.60 95 < 0.001
Vascular invasion
(yes vs no)
No 3 Random 0.40 (0.28-0.58) < 0.001 55 0.11
Ki-67 status
(positive vs negative)
Negative 4 Random 4.23 (1.33-13.48) 0.01 94 < 0.001
ER status
(positive vs negative)
Negative 9 Random 2.23 (1.19-4.18) 0.01 94 < 0.001
PR status
(positive vs negative)
Negative 7 Random 1.34 (0.88-2.04) 0.17 78 < 0.001
HER-2 status
(positive vs negative)
Negative 8 Random 0.08 (0.05-0.14) < 0.001 88 < 0.001
Tumor stroma
Age
(< 50 y vs ≥ 50 y)
≥ 50 years 5 Random 0.48 (0.13-1.85) 0.29 96 < 0.001
Tumor size
(< 2cm vs ≥ 2cm)
≥ 2cm 5 Random 0.59 (0.12-2.94) 0.52 97 < 0.001
Lymph node status
(N0 vs. N1-3)
N1-3 3 Random 0.71 (0.21-2.42) 0.59 91 < 0.001
Histological grade
(І, II vs III)
III 5 Random 0.32 (0.08-1.35) 0.12 97 < 0.001
Vascular invasion
(yes vs no)
No 2 Random 0.08 (0.01-2.16) 0.13 94 < 0.001
Ki-67 status
(positive vs negative)
Negative 1 0.32 (0.21-0.49)
ER status
(positive vs negative)
Negative 3 Random 5.00 (3.68-6.80) < 0.001 94 < 0.001
PR status
(positive vs negative)
Negative 3 Random 1.23 (0.60-2.55) 0.57 80 0.006
HER-2 status
(positive vs negative)
Negative 3 Random 0.21 (0.01-6.81) 0.38 99 < 0.001

TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ER, oestrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2.