Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar;43(3):244–251. doi: 10.15537/smj.2022.43.3.20210680

Table 3.

- The genotype frequencies of the Dombrock blood group polymorphism c.793A>G (rs11276) in Western Saudi Arabians compared with those in American, European, and South Asian populations listed in the 1000 Genomes database.

Western Saudis/1000 genomes populations* DO genotype frequency (n) P-value Post-hoc
DO*01/01 DO*01/02 DO*02/02 DO*01/01 vs. non - DO*01/01 DO*01/02 vs. non - DO*01/02 DO*02/02 vs. non - DO*02/02
% (n) P-value (df=1)
Western Saudis 0.18 (80) 0.5 (220) 0.32 (140) - - - -
Americans 0.14 (49) 0.47 (162) 0.39 (136) 0.067 - - -
CLM 0.15 (14) 0.44 (41) 0.41 (39) 0.194 - - -
MXL 0.12 (8) 0.50 (32) 0.37 (24) 0.452 - - -
PEL 0.09 (8) 0.43 (37) 0.47 (40) 0.013 0.048 0.275 0.007
PUR 0.18 (19) 0.50 (52) 0.32 (33) 1.000 - - -
Europeans 0.14 (70) 0.47 (235) 0.39 (198) 0.031 0.016 0.290 0.053
CEU 0.11 (11) 0.48 (48) 0.40 (40) 0.122 - - -
FIN 0.08 (8) 0.38 (38) 0.53 (53) <0.001 <0.001 0.179 <0.001
GBR 0.14 (13) 0.50 (46) 0.35 (32) 0.632 - - -
IBS 0.17 (18) 0.49 (53) 0.34 (36) 0.913 - - -
TSI 0.19 (20) 0.47 (50) 0.35 (37) 0.818 - - -
South Asians 0.13 (64) 0.51 (249) 0.36 (176) 0.078 - - -
BEB 0.12 (10) 0.52 (45) 0.36 (31) 0.32 - - -
GIH 0.13 (13) 0.41 (42) 0.47 (48) 0.016 0.178 0.092 0.005
ITU 0.2 (20) 0.51 (52) 0.29 (30) 0.878 - - -
PJL 0.09 (9) 0.55 (53) 0.35 (34) 0.110 - - -
STU 0.12 (12) 0.56 (57) 0.32 (33) 0.276 - - -

DO: Dombrock, CLM: Colombians from Medellin, Colombia, MXL: Mexican ancestry from Los Angeles, United States, PEL: Peruvians from Lima, Peru, PUR: Puerto Ricans from Puerto Rico, CEU: Utah residents (CEPH) with Northern and Western European ancestry, FIN: Finnish in Finland, GBR: British in England and Scotland, IBS: Iberian population in Spain, TSI: Toscani in Italy, BEB: Bengali from Bangladesh, GIH: Gujarati Indian from Houston, Texas, ITU: Indian Telugu from the United Kingdom, PJL: Punjabi from Lahore, Pakistan, STU: Sri Lankan Tamil from the United Kingdom, calculated Chi-squared p-value using 3×2 contingency tables. A p-value of ≤0.05 was considered significant and can be further analyzed using post-hoc analyses with Bonferroni correction, type I error was corrected by dividing the desired α=0.05 over the number of tests (0.05/3=0.0167), a p-value of ≤0.0167 was considered significant for post-hoc analyses