Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;12:909111. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.909111

Table 1.

The statistical details of 10 Hypogen algorithm-generated pharmacophore hypotheses.

Hypo no. Total cost Δcost a RMS b Correlation (R2) Max fit Features c
Hypo1 95.78 50.78 0.69 0.98 9.35 HBAL, HBAL, HBAL
Hypo2 101.21 45.36 0.92 0.96 9.79 HBAL, HBAL, HBAL
Hypo3 105.72 40.85 1.42 0.87 10.39 HBAL, HBAL, HBD, HYP
Hypo4 106.64 39.93 1.32 0.90 9.03 HBA, HBA, HBAL
Hypo5 107.38 39.18 1.50 0.86 10.10 HBA, HBAL, HBD, HYP
Hypo6 107.46 39.10 1.27 0.91 9.52 HBAL, HBAL, HBD
Hypo7 108.12 33.44 1.36 0.89 9.17 HBA, HBA, HBAL
Hypo8 108.59 37.97 1.46 0.87 11.3 HBA, HBAL, HBD, HYP
Hypo9 108.75 37.81 1.41 0.88 8.95 HBAL, HBAL, HBAL
Hypo10 108.83 37.73 1.41 0.88 8.95 HBA, HBAL, HBAL

aΔcost is the difference between the null cost (146.57) and the total cost. bRMS is root mean square deviation. cHBAL, hydrogen bond acceptor lipid; HBD, hydrogen bond donor; HBA, hydrogen bond acceptor; HYP, hydrophobic.