Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;13:891382. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.891382

Table 2.

Multiple linear regression models for the association of MAFLD and femoral bone mineral density.

Femoral bone mineral density(gm/cm2) Models MAFLD
β (95% CI) P value
Total femur BMD Crude 0.10 (0.08, 0.11) < 0.0001
Adjust I 0.08 (0.07, 0.09) < 0.0001
Adjust II 0.06 (0.05, 0.08) < 0.0001
Femur neck BMD Crude 0.06 (0.05, 0.07) < 0.0001
Adjust I 0.05 (0.04, 0.06) < 0.0001
Adjust II 0.04 (0.03, 0.05) < 0.0001
Trochanter BMD Crude 0.07 (0.06, 0.09) < 0.0001
Adjust I 0.06 (0.05, 0.07) < 0.0001
Adjust II 0.05 (0.04, 0.06) < 0.0001
Intertrochanter BMD Crude 0.11 (0.10, 0.13) < 0.0001
Adjust I 0.09 (0.08, 0.11) < 0.0001
Adjust II 0.07 (0.06, 0.09) < 0.0001

Survey-weight adjusted multiple linear regression model were used in this analysis. The adjust I was adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, marital status. The adjust II was adjusted for dring habit, uric acid, Phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, copd, cancer, maternal fracture history, family history of osteoporosis, in addition to adjust I.