Table 2.
Focus, initiative, driver, and contribution for development projects in eldercare, rated by developments leaders.
Question | Rating alternatives |
Strategic (N = 15) n Md (%) |
Operational (N = 9) n Md (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Focus | Influence of old adults | 15 1 (53%) | 9 3 (44%) |
Working conditions | 15 2 (60%) | 8 1 (56%) | |
Employee influence | 15 3 (47%) | 8 4 (67%) | |
Safety issues | 15 3 (33%) | 9 2 (44%) | |
Initiator | Strategic mgmt./politics | 15 1 (73%) | 9 1 (56%) |
DLs/change agents | 14 2 (60%) | 7 3 (33%) | |
FLMs | 14 3 (33%) | 9 2 (56%) | |
Assistant nurses | 14 4 (53%) | 8 4–5 (22, 22%)* | |
Old adults | 14 5 (20%) | 9 5 (22%) | |
Relatives | 14 5–6 (33, 20%)* | 9 5 (22%) | |
HR | 15 7 (67%) | 8 4–5 (22, 22%)* | |
Driver | Strategic level | 14 1–2 (47, 20%)* | 8 1–2 (44, 33%)* |
DL | 15 2 (27%) | 8 1–2 (44, 11%)* | |
Operational level | 13 3 (13%) | 8 2–3 (44, 11%)* | |
FLMs supported by DLs | 14 3 (40%) | 8 3 (44%) | |
Employees supported by DLs | 14 5 (53%) | 6 5 (44%) | |
Active participant | FLMs | 15 1 (73%) | 9 1 (78%) |
Assistant nurses | 14 2 (53%) | 9 3 (67%) | |
HR/other support function | 15 3 (33%) | 8 2 (56%) | |
Old adults | 15 4 (53%) | 8 4 (67%) | |
Relatives | 14 5 (60%) | 8 5 (67%) |
Median rating (Md), number of interviewees (n), and percentage of total number of interviewees' (N) ratings according to median rating (%). Rating: 1 = most common, 2 = second most common, etc.
Median rating of the alternative lying between two values, hence two percentages for the total number of interviewees.
Bold only means to separate the numbers.