Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;10:864272. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.864272

Table 2.

Focus, initiative, driver, and contribution for development projects in eldercare, rated by developments leaders.

Question Rating alternatives Strategic (N = 15)
n Md (%)
Operational (N = 9)
n Md (%)
Focus Influence of old adults 15 1 (53%) 9 3 (44%)
Working conditions 15 2 (60%) 8 1 (56%)
Employee influence 15 3 (47%) 8 4 (67%)
Safety issues 15 3 (33%) 9 2 (44%)
Initiator Strategic mgmt./politics 15 1 (73%) 9 1 (56%)
DLs/change agents 14 2 (60%) 7 3 (33%)
FLMs 14 3 (33%) 9 2 (56%)
Assistant nurses 14 4 (53%) 8 4–5 (22, 22%)*
Old adults 14 5 (20%) 9 5 (22%)
Relatives 14 5–6 (33, 20%)* 9 5 (22%)
HR 15 7 (67%) 8 4–5 (22, 22%)*
Driver Strategic level 14 1–2 (47, 20%)* 8 1–2 (44, 33%)*
DL 15 2 (27%) 8 1–2 (44, 11%)*
Operational level 13 3 (13%) 8 2–3 (44, 11%)*
FLMs supported by DLs 14 3 (40%) 8 3 (44%)
Employees supported by DLs 14 5 (53%) 6 5 (44%)
Active participant FLMs 15 1 (73%) 9 1 (78%)
Assistant nurses 14 2 (53%) 9 3 (67%)
HR/other support function 15 3 (33%) 8 2 (56%)
Old adults 15 4 (53%) 8 4 (67%)
Relatives 14 5 (60%) 8 5 (67%)

Median rating (Md), number of interviewees (n), and percentage of total number of interviewees' (N) ratings according to median rating (%). Rating: 1 = most common, 2 = second most common, etc.

*

Median rating of the alternative lying between two values, hence two percentages for the total number of interviewees.

Bold only means to separate the numbers.