Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 13;12(7):e059148. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059148

Table 5.

The reasons students did not use DDs

Never used in restorative procedures, N (%) Never used in endodontic treatment, N (%)
Total (N=145) CQMU (N=39) CQTGMC (N=106) P value Total (N=141) CQMU (N=46) CQTGMC (N=95) P value
DDs are considered to have disadvantages (such as time-consuming, inconvenient, etc) 33 (22.8) 8 (20.5) 25 (23.6) 0.696C 38 (27.0) 14 (30.4) 24 (25.3) 0.516C
I lack knowledge and experience 100 (69.0) 23 (59.0) 77 (72.6) 0.115C 103 (73.0) 33 (71.7) 70 (73.7) 0.807C
I do not think they are necessary 38 (26.2) 4 (10.3) 34 (32.1) 0.008*C 18 (12.8) 4 (8.7) 14 (14.7) 0.314C
DDs are not provided by internship institutions 42 (29.0) 3 (7.7) 39 (36.8) 0.001*C 42 (29.8) 3 (6.5) 39 (41.1) 0.000*C
Patients were unwilling or refused to use DDs 27 (18.6) 7 (17.9) 20 (18.9) 0.900C 26 (18.4) 10 (21.7) 16 (16.8) 0.482C
Other reasons 4 (2.8) 1 (2.6) 3 (2.8) 1.000F 4 (2.8) 1 (2.2) 3 (3.2) 1.000F

*P<0.05.

C, p value from χ2 test; CQMU, Chongqing Medical University; CQTGMC, Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College; DD, dental dam; F, p value from Fisher’s exact test.