Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 29;7(27):23457–23466. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01813

Table 1. Comparison of Analytical Methods Used to Differentiate between Empty and Full AAV Capsids.

Analytical Methods Fundamental Basis Characteristics
Anion exchange chromatography Surface charge density High accuracy, complex workflow, medium turnaround time (30 min/sample), difficult to establish optimal method applicable to all rAAV serotypes
Optical Density UV absorbance (density analysis) Fast turnaround time (15 min/sample), requires highly purified AAV to minimize interference with UV absorbance, varying concentration requirements (5 × 1011–1 × 1013 GC/mL)
Transmission electron microscopy Image analysis Direct characterization method, statistically small sample image size, high coefficient of variation, time-consuming (6 h/sample)
Charge detection mass spectrometry Mass to charge ratio High accuracy, requires extensive preparation, time-consuming (2 h/sample), low throughput, not easily accessible
Size-exclusion chromatography, multiangle light scattering Size exclusion and static light scattering High accuracy, medium turnaround time (20–30 min/sample) requires long column equilibration times, relatively high volumes of sample (30–50 μL per run), high concentration requirements (1 × 1013 VP/mL)
ELISA + qPCR Antibody specificity to full and empty capsids, used in tandem with qPCR Expensive, not scalable, lacks accuracy and precision, compounded error
Analytical ultracentrifugation Separates capsid sedimentation rate of particles (buoyant densities) High accuracy, large volume of samples (300–400 μL), not scalable, time-consuming (6 h/sample)
LabChip electrophoresis (Our method) Total protein/ssDNA ratio Scalable, fast turnaround time (6–15 min/sample), high throughput, requires low volumes (3–10 μL) and concentrations (>1 × 1011 GC/mL)