Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 12;22:760. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09864-y

Table 2.

Performances of biomarkers for the diagnosis of BCa

AUC (95% CI) Cut-off value Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Healthy vs. All BCa
  POSTN 0.78 (0.72 – 0.83)a1 14.5 71.7 75.4
  CA153 0.68 (0.61 – 0.74) 16.7 45.7 89.9
  CEA 0.68 (0.61 – 0.74) 2.2 49.1 84.0
  POSTN + CA153 0.80 (0.75 – 0.85)c3 - 76.3 72.5
  POSTN + CEA 0.82 (0.77 – 0.87)c3 - 74.0 78.3
  POSTN + CA153 + CEA 0.83 (0.78 – 0.87)c3 - 70.5 81.1
Healthy vs. locoregional BCa
  POSTN 0.72 (0.65 – 0.79)b 14.2 65.2 73.9
  CA153 0.57 (0.49 – 0.64) 14.3 37.4 82.6
  CEA 0.62 (0.55 – 0.69) 2.1 46.1 79.7
  POSTN + CA153 0.74 (0.67 – 0.80)c1 - 68.7 71.0
  POSTN + CEA 0.77 (0.70 – 0.82)c3 - 86.1 59.4
  POSTN + CA153 + CEA 0.77 (0.70 – 0.83)c3 - 87.8 55.1
Locoregional BCa vs. distant BCa
  POSTN 0.78 (0.71 – 0.84) 25.8 67.2 79.1
  CA153 0.82 (0.76 – 0.88) 19.3 75.9 74.8
  CEA 0.68 (0.61 – 0.75) 2.6 63.8 70.4
  POSTN + CA153 0.84 (0.78 – 0.89) 3 - 84.5 71.3
  POSTN + CEA 0.81 (0.74 – 0.86) - 58.6 92.1
  POSTN + CA153 + CEA 0.85 (0.78 – 0.90) 3 - 74.1 83.5

a−c, in comparison with CA153: a, P < 0.05; b, P < 0.01; c, P < 0.001

13, in comparison with CEA: 1, P < 0.05; 2, P < 0.01; 3, P < 0.001