Table 3.
Pain severity
Groups | CON | SHAM | ESP | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|
VAS 2 | 38 [23–53]a | 28 [19–41] | 20 [7–32] | 0.031 |
VAS 4 | 30 [18–51]a | 36 [16–46] | 19 [7–25] | 0.017 |
VAS 8 | 25 [20–35] | 21 [15–39] | 20 [8–22] | 0.114 |
VAS 12 | 24 [14–43] | 21 [14–28] | 16 [7–23] | 0.071 |
VAS 24 | 20 [15–35] | 19 [13–29] | 17 [6–20] | 0.062 |
Data are shown as medians [interquartile ranges]. Probability was calculated with the Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks. If this test showed a significant result, a pairwise comparison was made with the Mann–Whitney U test. Significant calculated probability was set at 0.017 after the Bonferroni correction.
CON control group, ESP erector spinae plane group, SHAM sham block group, VAS visual analog scale.
aCON is significantly higher than ESP