Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 14;22:222. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01760-z

Table 3.

Pain severity

Groups CON SHAM ESP p value
VAS 2 38 [23–53]a 28 [19–41] 20 [7–32] 0.031
VAS 4 30 [18–51]a 36 [16–46] 19 [7–25] 0.017
VAS 8 25 [20–35] 21 [15–39] 20 [8–22] 0.114
VAS 12 24 [14–43] 21 [14–28] 16 [7–23] 0.071
VAS 24 20 [15–35] 19 [13–29] 17 [6–20] 0.062

Data are shown as medians [interquartile ranges]. Probability was calculated with the Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks. If this test showed a significant result, a pairwise comparison was made with the Mann–Whitney U test. Significant calculated probability was set at 0.017 after the Bonferroni correction.

CON control group, ESP erector spinae plane group, SHAM sham block group, VAS visual analog scale.

aCON is significantly higher than ESP