Table 2. Evaluation of ecological niche overlap between pairs of species of the genus Testudo.
| Overlap | Lin | Blob | Id | BG | IdB | BGB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. g. graeca vs | D | 0.193 | 0.285 | 0.277 | 0.277 | 0.151 | 0.096 | 0.096 |
| T. g. marokkensis | P | 0.109 | 0.406 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.001 | 0.439 | |
| Rho | 0.338 | 0.330 | 0.330 | 0.129 | ||||
| T. g. marokkensis vs | D | 0.117 | 0.194 | 0.191 | 0.191 | 0.155 | 0.277 | 0.277 |
| T. g. whitei | P | 0.168 | 0.228 | 0.010 | 0.158 | 0.061 | 0.397 | |
| Rho | −0.357 | −0.354 | −0.354 | 0.018 | ||||
| T. g. whitei vs | D | 0.623 | 0.313 | 0.316 | 0.321 | 0.298 | 0.452 | 0.452 |
| T. g. nabeulensis | P | 0.277 | 0.495 | 0.010 | 0.375 | 0.657 | 0.057 | |
| Rho | 0.286 | 0.273 | 0.284 | 0.375 | ||||
| T. graeca western vs | D | 0.309 | No | No | 0.158 | 0.146 | 0.230 | 0.230 |
| T. graeca eastern | P | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.001 | 0.132 | |||
| Rho | −0.645 | −0.668 | ||||||
| T. g. ibera vs | D | 0.260 | 0.282 | 0.282 | 0.286 | 0.239 | 0.333 | 0.333 |
| T. g. terrestris | P | 0.149 | 0.069 | 0.010 | 0.040 | 0.838 | 0.021 | |
| Rho | −0.089 | −0.089 | −0.081 | −0.228 | ||||
| T. g. ibera vs | D | 0.250 | 0.260 | 0.263 | 0.264 | 0.336 | 0.116 | 0.116 |
| T. g. buxtoni | P | 0.416 | 0.227 | 0.010 | 0.099 | 0.085 | 0.350 | |
| Rho | −0.618 | −0.612 | −0.614 | −0.351 | ||||
| T. g. buxtoni vs | D | 0.174 | 0.221 | 0.218 | 0.219 | 0.235 | 0.057 | 0.057 |
| T. g. terrestris | P | 0.238 | 0.248 | 0.009 | 0.012 | 0.001 | 0.490 | |
| Rho | −0.141 | −0.141 | −0.127 | 0.412 | ||||
| T. h. hermanni vs | D | 0.366 | 0.195 | 0.198 | 0.197 | 0.084 | 0.206 | 0.206 |
| T. h. boettgeri | P | 0.208 | 0.378 | 0.005 | 0.010 | 0.013 | 0.058 | |
| Rho | −0.121 | −0.133 | −0.123 | −0.504 |
Notes.
- Lin
- linear range-breaking test
- Blob
- blob rangebreaking test
- Id
- identity test
- BG
- background test
- IdB
- identity test (ecospat)
- BGB
- background test (ecospat)
- D
- Schoener’s D
- Rho
- Spearman rank correlation
- No
- no geographic contact