Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 14;17(7):e0270420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270420

Table 1. Output of descriptive quantitative analysis.

Stakeholder: Learners Instructors Both Groups of Stakeholders
Component Mean±SD Percentage of the Mean Category Mean±SD Percentage of the Mean Category Mean±SD Percentage of the Mean Category
1 I was able to effectively cope with the higher technological demands of distance learning. 4.08±0.81 81.6 A-SA 4.56±0.51 91.2 A-SA 4.20±0.77 84 A-SA
2 I was able to manage my time and efforts to cope with the transition to distance learning. 3.79±0.99 75.8 A 4.56±0.71 91.2 A-SA 3.99±0.98 79.8 A
3 I was able to monitor and evaluate my performance, and if need be- intervene, to cope with the transition to distance learning. 3.81±0.86 76.2 A 4.44±0.62 88.8 A-SA 3.97±0.85 79.4 A
4 I sought help, if needed, from students, colleagues, University staff, and/ or family members to cope with the transition to distance learning. 3.98±0.75 79.6 A 4.39±0.70 87.8 A-SA 4.08±0.75 81.6 A-SA
Total of the Means/ Overall Score of Adaptability: 15.66±2.77 78.3 A 17.94±1.76 89.7 A-SA 16.23±2.73 81.15 A-SA

A = Agree, SA = Strongly Agree.