Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 14;33(1):145–159. doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10057-4

Table 4.

Sensibility of the complete job demands and accommodation planning tool (JDAPT) questions

Sensibility characteristic Workers Organizational Respondents All
n = 46 n = 23 n = 69
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Comprehensiveness
 Domain questions complete (no new job demands added)
  Physical demands 33 (71.7) 17 (73.9) 50 (72.5)
  Cognitive demands 34 (73.9) 18 (78.3) 52 (75.4)
  Working with others 29 (63.0) 15 (65.2) 44 (63.8)
  Working conditions 37 (80.4) 20 (87.0) 57 (82.6)
Understandability
 Instructions clear 45 (97.8) 22 (95.7) 67 (97.1)
 Made sense to ask about…
  Importance of demand to job 46 (100) 21 (91.3) 67 (97.1)
  Ability/difficulty performing 44 (95.7) 20 (87.0) 64 (92.8)
  Changes in ability over time 44 (95.7) 19 (82.6) 63 (91.3)
 Domain labels are clear 35 (76.1) 17 (73.9) 52 (75.4)
Relevance
 Questions helped me think about my/the job 46 (100) 21 (91.3) 67 (97.1)
 Would help someone understand a worker’s challenges 43 (93.5) 21 (91.3) 64 (92.8)
  Perceived need for JDAPT 43 (93.5) 21 (91.3) 64 (92.8)
  Would use JDAPT 41 (89.1) 20 (87.0) 61 (88.4)
Feasibility
 Easy to complete overall 41 (89.1) 18 (78.3) 59 (85.5)
  Detailed job demand questions easy to answer
  Importance of demand to job 40 (87.0) 19 (82.6) 59 (85.5)
  Ability/difficulty performing 32 (69.6) 16 (69.6) 48 (69.6)
  Changes in ability over time 35 (76.1) 17 (73.9) 52 (75.4)
Length
 Minutes to complete (mean/SD) 15.1 (6.1) 12.4 (5.0) 14.2 (5.9)
 Length perceived as adequate 35 (76.1) 18 (78.2) 53 (76.8)