Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 9;33(5):1391–1407. doi: 10.1007/s11224-022-02012-z

Table 3.

ADME and Toxicity properties of selected compounds by Qikprop analysis

Compound namea Molecular weight (g/mol)b QPlogo/wc QPlogSd QPlog HERGe QPlogBBf #metab ± g QPlogKhsah %human oral absorptioni
Vadadustat 306.70 2.75  −4.31  −3.55  −1.696 3  −0.131 66.68
Fenbufen 254.28 3.19  −4.89  −3.48  −1.054 2  −0.169 81.72
Compound A 287.27 2.16  −2.78  −3.22  −1.638 4  −0.402 67.672
Compound B 301.29 1.79  −2.65  −3.49  −1.598 4  −0.619 67.63
Compound C 321.71 2.64  −3.64  −3.40  −1.573 4  −0.299 69.37
Compound D 271.27 2.22  −3.02  −3.30  −1.595 4  −0.326 67.21

aLigand name

bMolecular weight of the compound (acceptable range: 130–725 g/mol)

cpredicted octanol/water partition co-efficient logP (acceptable range: −2.0 to 6.5)

dPredicted aqueous solubility; S in Mol/L (acceptable range: −6.5 to 0.5)

epredicted IC50 value for blockage of HERG K+ channels (acceptable range: below −5.0)

fpredicted blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability (acceptable range: −3.0 to 1.2)

gnumber of likely metabolic reactions (range: 1 to 8)

hpredicted Human serum albumin binding (acceptable range: −1.5 to 1.5)

ipercentage of human oral absorption (< 25% is poor and > 80% is high)