. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 27.

Published in final edited form as: J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2022 Feb 27;31(5):660–676. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2022.2038751

Table 3.

Non-Physical Violence Models: Indirect effect of nonphysical violence (X) on existential wellbeing (Y) through Africultural coping subscales (M)

Mediators	R ²	F	p	A	b	c’	ab (Effect)	95%CI

Physical
Cognitive Emotional
Debriefing	.10	2.38	.02	0.03^*	0.44^**	−0.03	0.01	−0.006, − 0.034
Spiritual-Centered Coping	.20	5.34	<.001	0.04^**	0.71^**	−0.05^*	0.03	0.009, −.056
Collective Coping	.19	5.18	<.001	0.02	0.74^**	−0.03	0.01	−0.007, − 0.043
Ritual-Centered Coping	.07	1.62	.13	0.02^**	0.83^**	−0.02	0.01	0.008, − .039
Africultual Coping Total	.19	5.22	<.001	0.11^*	0.24^**	−0.04^*	0.02	0.004, − 0.057
Non-Physical
Cognitive Emotional
Debriefing	.13	3.14	<.01	0.03^*	.48^**	−.08^**	0.018	−0.0004, − 0.044
Spiritual-Centered Coping	.22	5.81	<.001	0.01	.71^**	− .07^**	0.01	−0.014, − 0.039
Collective Coping	.22	5.68	<.001	0.006	.74^**	− .06^*	0.005	−0.020, − 0.033
Ritual-Centered Coping	.09	2.02	.05	0.01	.85^**	− .06^*	0.009	−0.005, − 0.031
Africultual Coping Total	.22	5.94	<.001	0.07	.25^**	− .08^**	0.01	−0.011, − 0.050

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

^**

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).