Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 28;3(1):117–124. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2021.0054

Table 2.

Dietary Counseling Profile of Patients Undergoing Dietary Counseling via Telehealth or via Presential Face to Face Interaction with the Dietitian

Variables FTF (n = 81)
TH (n = 78)
p
n (%) n (%)
Weekends and holidays
 No 47 (58.0) 27 (34.6) 0.005
 Yes 34 (42.0) 51 (65.4)
Nutritional care level
 No classification 8 (9.9) 8 (10.3) 0.54
 Primary 11 (13.6) 8 (10.3)
 Secondary 56 (69.1) 51 (65.4)
 Tertiary 6 (7.4) 11 (14.1)
Consistency of diet
 Liquid 5 (6.2) 6 (7.7) 0.94
 Creamy 23 (28.4) 14 (17.9) 0.17
 Pureed 9 (11.1) 12 (15.4) 0.57
 Soft 25 (30.9) 23 (29.5) 0.98
 Mechanical soft 13 (16.0) 16 (20.5) 0.60
 Regular 10 (12.3) 9 (11.5) >0.99
Nutritional supplements
 No 75 (92.6) 70 (89.7) 0.72
 Yes 6 (7.4) 8 (10.3)
Dietary modifications
 Low in fat 7 (8.6) 2 (2.6) 0.16
 Low sodium 5 (6.2) 4 (5.1) >0.99
 High in fiber 3 (3.7) 3 (3.8) >0.99
 Low fiber 17 (21.0) 28 (35.9) 0.05
 Diabetic 11 (13.6) 11 (14.1) >0.99
 Lactose free 11 (13.6) 5 (6.4) 0.21
 Others 6 (7.4) 8 (10.3) 0.72
 No restrictions 32 (39.5) 27 (34.6) 0.63
Number of restrictions
 0 32 (39.5) 27 (34.6) 0.49
 1 41 (50.6) 41 (52.6)
 2 5 (6.2) 10 (12.8)
 3 3 (3.7) 0 (0.0)

p-Values by Mann–Whitney testing to numerical variables and chi-square or Fisher exact testing to categorical variables.