Table 1.
Mean RMSE (mm) and standard deviation of RMSE (mm) of hemipelves reconstructed via contralateral mirroring and shape modelling
| Reconstruction model and geometry | Percentage of original surface (%) | Whole hemipelvis | Acetabulum | Ilium | Ischium | Pubis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |||
| Contralateral mirroring | N/A | 1.21 | 0.29 | 0.73 | 0.20 | 1.11 | 0.23 | 0.83 | 0.20 | 0.85 | 0.24 | |
| SSM | Intact hemipelvis | 100 | 1.11 | 0.54 | 0.75 | 0.12 | 1.07 | 0.49 | 0.97 | 0.19 | 0.97 | 0.23 |
| IS cut | 68 | 1.83 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.17 | 1.43 | 0.77 | 1.23 | 0.24 | 1.22 | 0.28 | |
| Ilium cut | 75 | 1.51 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.11 | 1.47 | 0.50 | 1.02 | 0.22 | 1.02 | 0.25 | |
| PT cut | 94 | 1.25 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.15 | 1.13 | 0.59 | 1.05 | 0.22 | 1.06 | 0.29 | |
IS, ischial spine protrusion; PT, pubic tubercle